User talk:King Jarilo

June 2021

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Oto Bihalji-Merin—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 13:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name Bihalji is not correct. I changed correctly name Bihali King Jarilo (talk) 13:29, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Oto Bihalji-Merin. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 13:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oto Bihalji-Merin, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 13:35, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You should stop writing Bihalji! His name is Bihali! King Jarilo (talk) 13:54, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please note Wikipedia:Article_titles#Use_commonly_recognizable_names. --Serols (talk) 13:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

His name is Bihali! Not Bihalji! King Jarilo (talk) 13:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Oto Bihalji-Merin. Serols (talk) 14:36, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be even too blinded by your senseless activism, that you don't even get it, that on of your unsourced changes destroys the proper inclusion of a picture, because the 'name of the picture is written that way, and some POV-changes to that name will only erase the picture from the article. You started a topic on the talk-page of Oto Bihalji-Merin, but again without a shred of reasoning, why don't you start giving at least some reason, some source, something, that can be discussed. Up to now you provided absolutely nothing. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 14:42, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavle_Bihali King Jarilo (talk) 14:56, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

?? Wikipedia is no reliable source. This on the other hand looks fine for me. This, and this as well. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 15:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you just said that Wikipedia is not reliable source? And you try to write something wrong on Wikipedia on purpose? His REAL name is Bihali just like his brother is Bihali and his grandchildren and his ENTIRE FAMILY! King Jarilo (talk) 15:52, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And do you have anything, hat sustains your up to now unfounded proclamations? So far you just edit-warred and didn't provide anything besides because I sayz so! That's a wee bit less then expected. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 15:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sent you 3 links with real name Bihali King Jarilo (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't send me anything, and you should provide such sources in the relevant discussions, not sending something somehow somewhere. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 17:25, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 16:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

King Jarilo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I think I was doing the right things because family name is BihaliKing Jarilo (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 17:10, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I hope you unblock me and I will not change the name Bihali anymore King Jarilo (talk) 17:09, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sent this to https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9E%D1%82%D0%BE_%D0%91%D0%B8%D1%85%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%B8_%D0%9C%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%BD King Jarilo (talk) 17:55, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the sources, there is one article, where he is written with the j, and he's as well written with the љ, that's the letter that implies the j. I fail to see any other proof in this serbiam Wikipedia articles, which are of course written in Cyrillic, not transcribed to Latin. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 04:21, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I sent this as a proof to https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82 King Jarilo (talk) 17:57, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This to https://sr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%9D%D0%BE%D0%BB%D0%B8%D1%82 King Jarilo (talk) 18:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am from Serbia and j and lj are different letters. It’s like i and y are different and have different meanings. Still I think you blocked me for no reason because I offered a few evidence. And at die end I said ok if you want that lj љ stay I will no more make corrections and you still blocked me. It’s not fair King Jarilo (talk) 05:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]