User talk:KingLouis51

Kingz platoon

A tag has been placed on Kingz' platoon, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. thadius856_{talk|airports|neutrality} 18:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello KingLouis51! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Aaron Garbut - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aaron Garbut

The article Aaron Garbut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:N, in that there is nothing that establishes his notability separately from the series of games. Also an unsourced blp

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Izno (talk) 00:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Ebert

Please do not add original research to articles, such as this edit of yours to Roger Ebert. Original research refers to material obtained through personal knowledge, or unpublished syntheses of previously published material, rather than material that is supported by reliable, verifiable sources. Please make sure you cite a reliable source for all of the information you add or re-add to articles. You can learn how to do this at Wikipedia:Citing sources. If you have any other questions about editing, just let me know. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 01:21, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aaron Garbut for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Garbut is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Garbut until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. This is also Sven Manguard 19:17, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you made a change to an article, PewDiePie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATic message me! 23:29, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aaron Garbut listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Aaron Garbut. Since you had some involvement with the Aaron Garbut redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Lordtobi (✉) 17:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]