User talk:Kindsouvik

Kindsouvik, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Kindsouvik! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Protection of Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir Page created by me

Moved from Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Lourdes 2

I have created a article about a school named "Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir" after the concern from the school and that page is reviewed and verified too created 1 year ago.... The school wants to protect the Introduction part including quick facts to be "Fully Protected" Please help — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kindsouvik (talk • contribs)

@Kindsouvik: Hello. Wouldn't you like to make this request at WP:RFPP? -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is the page where users request to become an admin, not where users request an admin to take action. power~enwiki (π, ν) 16:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the place to request page protection. Also, please do not remove or alter other user's talk page comments. Thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note This conversation was moved from Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Lourdes 2 where it was off-topic. Please see the comments above if you want to request protection modifications. Also, please be sure to sign your posts so people can better reply to you. Thank you, — xaosflux ^Talk 16:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"The school wants to protect the Introduction part"

Hate to be the one to tell you this, but if your are editing at the behest of the school, you may have a conflict of interest (WP:COI). WP:PAID might also apply. Please read and heed those two items. Thanks, -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:35, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lions Calcutta Greater Vidya Mandir until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:42, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kindsouvik, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

-- Amanda (aka DQ) 02:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kindsouvik. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. GAB^gab 02:33, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 11:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

{{Unblock|reason= I understood my fault. I will not to Sockpuppetry again. I don't do anything illegal and nor cause any harm to Wikipedia. I see some accounts blocked as claimed my account but that are not mine. I have only three accounts TechnifyLife and Fountaineditor Kindsouvik 10:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Unblock appeal with reason

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kindsouvik (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understood my fault. I will not to Sockpuppetry again. I don't do anything illegal and nor cause any harm to Wikipedia. I see some accounts blocked as claimed my account but that are not mine. I have only three accounts TechnifyLife and Fountaineditor

Decline reason:

Given how recently you've been violating WP:SOCK, nobody's going to unblock you in the immediate future. However, you might be eligible for unblock consideration if you demonstrate you are willing to avoid violating WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK by refraining from editing for a while. You'll also need to list your sockpuppet accounts and explain why you lied about several of them when requesting unblocks. Yamla (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.