User talk:Kim Hoang 2800

October 2020

Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Volvo Trucks, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 02:50, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to SAIC-GM-Wuling. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. lavender|^{(formerly HMSSolent)}|lambast 02:53, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at LinkUp, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Evaders99 (talk) 03:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 5 April 2021 for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 05:26, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kim Hoang 2800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did something wrong and i won't happen again and will make useful contributions instead Kim Hoang 2800 (talk) 07:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To be unblocked, please specifically explain what you did wrong, how you will avoid doing it again, and what productive contributions you wish to make. As this request does not do those things, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 08:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kim Hoang 2800 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did wrong that i vandalism many article i won't happen again and make useful contributions instead

Decline reason:

No thanks. This demonstrates you lack sufficient understanding of the English language to edit here. Additionally, it does not address the reason for your block. Yamla (talk) 11:03, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.