User talk:KimKelting

Welcome!

Hi KimKelting! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Cosmic6811 🍁 (T · C) 06:12, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks,

I'm a contributor on the German Wikipedia and I've made some small edits here before, but my English skills weren't great for a while. However, I've since improved it. And I believe I'm ready to use it here. I am confident that I can continue improving my English through my contributions here. --KimKelting (talk) 06:35, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Up

Like I said in my edit comment, I couldn't tell (from the rather dark YouTube video) whether they were skulls or helmets. If you're sure they were the former, that's fine. Clarityfiend (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I meant by "too much interpretation" that I don't think you can tell if Muntz is implying he killed other travelers. I also think that they are helmets, not skulls. Well, I'm actually sure they are helmets. And sorry for the delayed answer. KimKelting (talk) 04:00, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

I don't know why you think it's a good idea to "reassess" one article per minute, but you're obviously not taking any time or care with your "reassessments". This is not helping to build the encyclopedia. Please stop. Toughpigs (talk) 04:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toughpigs I wanted to resolve conflicts within the classes. But now they still exist. I also looked at the articles beforehand. KimKelting (talk) 13:12, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think you read properly what you reset. KimKelting (talk) 13:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kim, I'm sorry -- I misunderstood what you were doing. I thought you were randomly changing assessments, but I see now that you were trying to resolve conflicts. I apologize for misunderstanding! I'll self-revert my changes back to yours. Toughpigs (talk) 15:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Toughpigs Thanks, and no problem. Everyone can make mistakes sometimes. KimKelting (talk) 17:58, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chloe De Los Santos (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Chloe De Los Santos and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, KimKelting! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I expand the article any further? So add references and so on? KimKelting (talk) 18:38, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes if you can expand and more importantly add sources to show she is notable (See WP:N), then please do and resubmit. At the moment you have no sources, let alone significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources that is required to show notability. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 18:41, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was only really the very beginning of the article anyway, I'm nowhere near finished with it. KimKelting (talk) 18:43, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]