User talk:Killingussoftly

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cold open, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Edinburgh Wanderer 22:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Skins (TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Skins (TV series) was changed by Killingussoftly (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960191 on 2012-01-23T22:19:40+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:19, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Labrador, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Labrador was changed by Killingussoftly (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951962 on 2012-01-26T14:42:41+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:42, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Labrador with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

JamesBWatson who the fk are u and why are u telin me wat do do? go away, seeeeriously i can do wat i want. ur not my mom jeez. Killingussoftly (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:50, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Killingussoftly (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am new and i dont really know what i am supposed to do here on wikipedia, i dont know why i have been blocked. i was trying to be helpful and put my opinion on pages but it always gets deleted by somebody else. i feel like the people who have been here for a long time are taking advantage of me with their power by deleting things i write everytime i edit, and now someone else has done it too by blocking me from editing at all. its not fair that the new users here are bullied. i was never told that whatever i was doing was wrong so how would i know that i needed to stop? if someone would kindly tell me what kind of things i should write when i edit pages then i should be able to come back and not be "vandalism." Killingussoftly (talk) 14:58, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to have Wikipedia confused with facebook, this is a serious encyclopedia not a chatsite. And threatening to create another account doesn't help your case, if you do we'll just block that one too Jac16888 ^Talk 15:04, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

ok just unblock me becuz if u dont ill make another account..just unblck me cuz i like this uersname too.

@Jac16888 ur stupid. i never said i thought this was facebook. why are u assuming things? too bad i already made another account and u cant just ban it because on that account i havent done ANYTHING WRONG so screw you, i will still edit things on my other account. bye losers. by the way i'm an adminstrator of wikipedia on my other account so ill ban you. Killingussoftly (talk) 15:08, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately for us if you don't do any wrong with your new account then you'll be improving Wikipedia which means we win. Much more likely is that you'll do something moronic and we'll quickly spot you and block that account too, which means we still win. And please, by all means go ahead and block me, I'll wait--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:21, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]