User talk:Killingthedream

Welcome!

Hello, Killingthedream, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Punkmorten 14:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bale-routh.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bale-routh.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 06:05, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Bale-routh.jpg

The image is originally two promotional images, they were put together for comparison, both individual images have been approved on wikipedia. I got the new image from a website which is listed on the image page. So I don't know what the right tag is. --Killingthedream 08:10, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Depends. What is it going to be used for? --Carnildo 03:58, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Randi1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Randi1.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or ask for help at Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. Thank you. -- Carnildo 10:40, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Dep. Garcia ^{(Talk to Me)} 16:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unverified claims in Ronaldo and Zinedine Zidane

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Ytny 12:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

300 Edits

Recently, you contributed sme material to the 300 article. Unfortunately, it was removed (the statement you added had already appeared int he article), but I didn't want you to miss out on the fun. Reverts happen all the time, so don't let it get you down, and I'm sure we'll see you again. Cheers! Arcayne 14:52, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introducing deliberate factual errors

Thanks for experimenting with the page Darkest Hour (band) on Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Leon Sword 23:08, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giotto

Concerning your vandalism of that page, if you continue, you will be banned from editting.

--Amandajm 01:52, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sodam Yat

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Sodam Yat, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you. Dlong 21:05, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop trying to override consensus on The Black Dahlia Murder page.

Consensus stands that said band is both melodic death metal and metalcore. What the band thinks is academically misleading when defining their genre. (EXAMPLE: Many nu-metal bands don't like being called nu-metal ... does that mean they aren't nu-metal?) Plenty of info exists on the talk page explaining how they are a part of the metalcore genre. It seems you have ignored these discussions as this is now the second time you have brought up disagreement. Stop trying to override consensus on this page. This dispute is long resolved and blanking out information can constitute as a form of Wikipedia:Vandalism.--Danteferno 04:37, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Bale

Erm, okay. I'm not sure why you're sharing this with me. I reverted a POV issue on the article previously. María (habla conmigo) 21:50, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Giotto di Bondone & Galileo Galilei

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Giotto di Bondone. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --noclador (talk) 11:24, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Galileo Galilei. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --noclador (talk) 11:26, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]