User talk:Kika chuck

Welcome!

Hello Kika chuck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Fawcett5 04:14, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Albert Kissling

A tag has been placed on Albert Kissling requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Powers ^T 19:57, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Albert Kissling

An article that you have been involved in editing, Albert Kissling, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Kissling. Thank you. Powers ^T 20:14, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

David L. Norvell

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of David L. Norvell, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.nmgcb.org/board/bios.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:03, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 156.34.222.210 (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted as well, preventing anyone from linking to them from all of Wikipedia. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 18:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Chapter VII: Hope and Sorrow‎. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 18:21, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Linkspam

May I dispute this? The thing that kept being edited out was not spam. I have no affiliation with that site at all and per wikipedia rules, professional reviews on albums are allowed. In fact, many bands and albums have reviews linked from that very site. Furthermore, this particular user has had their IP address/name change a few times, suggesting that they wish to hide their identity so they can be obnoxious. Kika chuck (talk) 18:31, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He edits from a dynamic IP address which means it changes a lot. Please don't call him obnoxious, that's a personal attack. He's actually a very experienced editor. The guideline specifically states that no amateur review sites can be used; which is what your link is. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian ^{Call me Pat} 18:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Kika chuck! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Paul Bardacke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:01, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]