User talk:Khalid Faruqi

Good News For Students

Hi, This is Khalid Faruqi pls have a look at my recently published article related to the efforts of Dawateislami.

Certainly, education has always been considered as one of the most important and basic rights of every citizen. Unfortunately, in our educational institutions, Islamic education is not being taught properly and students are facing difficulties. It is good to know that the Federal Board of Education has recognized the Board of Dawat-e-Islami named Kanz-ul-Madaris. Now the Jamia-tul-Madina has become a degree-awarding institution. Undoubtedly, there is a dire need for Islamic education and hopefully, Dawat-e-Islami will do its best as always to spread the teachings of the Quran and Sunnah. However, upon completion of Dars-e-Nizami course, students will receive a certificate from Jamia-tul-Madina and a master’s degree from Higher Education Commission. I personally say thanks to the Federal Board and HEC for this approval and give my best wishes to Dawat-e-Islami. KHALID FARUQI Karachi ) Khalid Faruqi (talk) 11:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

References

Your submission at Articles for creation: Good News For Students (June 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Good News For Students and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Good News For Students, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Khalid Faruqi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021

Hello, I'm Mosesheron. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Islam have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mosesheron (talk) 14:05, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Khalid Faruqi! Your additions to Dawat-e-Islami‎ have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Certes (talk) 11:59, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dawat-e-Islami, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 23:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Good News For Students

Hello, Khalid Faruqi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Good News For Students, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Good News For Students

Hello, Khalid Faruqi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Good News For Students".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:44, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

July 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Dawat-e-Islami, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Content you added was copied from another website, and thus was a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Please don't add copyright material to Wikipedia. — Diannaa (talk) 17:15, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dawat-e-Islami, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Dawat-e-Islami. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 18:18, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and/or Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption, incl. copyright violations.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 07:18, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Yamaguchi先生,

I want to say that I had used proper citation and did not make any disruptive content again. So why you have blocked me. I am very frequent user of Wikipedia and request you to make me allow for editing.

Looking forward for your message

Regards Khalid Faruqi (talk) 08:59, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Khalid Faruqi, thank you for your message. Your most recent edits were copyright violations, pasted directly from the website at www.dawateislami.net. This was actually the third set of copyright violations that had to be removed from this article in recent weeks. Please see the section on your talk page labeled Wikipedia and copyright. Competence is required to edit the English-language Wikipedia. If you are unable to to write constructively in your own words, you may consider contributing to another Wikipedia project in your native language. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 16:41, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello Yamaguchi先生,

I can understand and I make sure that it would not be happened again. Please let me allow this time and unblock my I'd as I was a regular editor of Wikipedia.

Thanking you, I remain Khalid Faruqi (talk) 08:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Recent edits

You do not appear familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. In particular, Wikipedia requires citations to reliable and authoritative third-party sources. Two good sets of Wikipedia guidelines that I have found really useful can be found HERE, regarding verifiability and HERE, regarding the need to maintain a neutral point of view. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 11:28, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Abbasshaikh124 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abbasshaikh124. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 17:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)