User talk:Khalibali
Hello, You recently declined my article on John W. Barber. I didn't see any notes that you left. Can you tell me why you declined it?Cmorrison3 (talk) 01:51, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Khalibali, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!
August 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Valentin Zhukovski may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- [[db-g1}}
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Slow down...
[edit]I've just declined two of your speedy requests - Gareth Duke is not promotional in the slightest, and Ashkan khalkhaly claims notability, even though I have distinct doubts about its accuracy. Please take a bit of time to re-read WP:CSD. Peridon (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- I've retagged Ashkan khalkhaly as a hoax. Peridon (talk) 12:23, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks For Informing me about some of my Decisions, Yes Ashkan khalkhaly does comply for Hoax. --Khali 12:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Stop
[edit]I'm calling on you to stop tagging for now. Your tags are too often not right, A Russian writer who died in 1918 cannot be promotional, railway stations are generally regarded as notable, a film studio that's demolished and totally out of action cannot be promotional. I would like you to spend some time looking at the articles at CAT:CSD. Just look, and see how they are tagged. Then see what happened. Read WP:CSD. Don't tag again today. Tagging for deletion takes skill and knowledge. You shouldn't rush into it. Same applies to working at Articles for Creation. That is an area for experienced editors. I did the watch and see thing for quite some time before I started tagging myself. Peridon (talk) 12:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Discussion on the Administrator's noticeboard
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. AndyTheGrump (talk) 13:05, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Pakithedjay (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 20:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC) |
What is going on here,
Khalibali (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here I am not sure why you are doing so
Decline reason:
Per discussion below. — Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
. @Ponyo Sock Pupperty means Improper purposes include attempts to deceive or mislead other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, or otherwise violate community standards and policies. In my contributions where i tried to deceive, disrupt or distort?
- Review my contributions here and tell me where in the world i tried to deceive?
- Please point out to me which part of WP:SOCK#LEGIT your use of multiple accounts falls under? --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 21:34, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Can some Admin inform the Editor why he is being blocked? Liz Read! Talk! 21:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
- The fact that they were blocked for the inappropriate use of multiple accounts has already been explained in the block message and my follow-up question to Khalibali above, as well as at User talk:Pakithedjay# Important note and Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#User:Khalibali - guidance required. If the editor has any additional questions regarding the block they are free to ask them. Have you had communications with them that make you believe they are unaware of why they were blocked? --Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 22:02, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: Ariel Abshire
[edit]Hello Khalibali, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Ariel Abshire, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Doesn't quite qualify for A7; does make an assertion of significance, and as such, should be taken to WP:AfD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 21:56, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Coleoptere "reliable sources"
[edit]Hi there Khalibali, Thanks for reviewing my article submission. The three sources I cited are each known, independent, non-self-published online magazines and newsletters with their own editorial staffs. One of the three sources (Refinery29) even has its own Wikipedia page. Why are they deemed unreliable? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lisabaird (talk • contribs) 22:22, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Your future participation at Articles for creation
[edit]Crossposted to here and here.
Please read Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation#Please watch for the following editors in about a month (or likely archived as Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/2013 4#Please watch for the following editors in about a month or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Articles for creation/2013 5#Please watch for the following editors in about a month) (diff) and re-familarize yourself with all Wikipedia content policies and guidelines as well as steps 1-3 in Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Reviewing instructions before approving or decling articles in Wikipedia:Articles for creation. I strongly recommend that you go even further and not accept or decline articles in AFC at all until you have re-established your reputation as an editor who knows and follows the rules and customs of Wikipedia, particularly those surrounding content and user behavior.
Please note that this is a personal request and I do not speak for the other editors at the WikiProject. However, in light of your recent history, I believe most active reviewers would endorse these recommendations. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 21:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Pakistan User Group
[edit]| Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan | ||
|---|---|---|
 |
Hi Khalibali! We are currently in the process of establishing a User Group for Pakistani Wikimedians with the following objectives;
As an approved User Group, we will be recognised by the Wikimedia Foundation and officially supported by the Wikimedia movement. If you reside in Pakistan or actively work on Pakistan-related topics and can help in functional activities of the Pakistani User Group, please join the official planning group mailing list. For more details about the proposed user group, please visit the official page at http://pk.wikimedia.org. |
 |
You are receiving this message because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:24, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan
[edit]
Hi Khalibali!
Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.
Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.
Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk
Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK
Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan
Hi Khalibali!
Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July.
Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.
You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan
Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
[edit]Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)