User talk:Kgyt/Archive-2017
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kgyt. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Nameless comment
Hey, I left a note for you at the bottom! Get back to,me when you get a chance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.174.85 (talk) 02:14, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Welcome
Welcome!
Hello, Kgyt, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Lectonar 13:54, 4 August 2005 (UTC)
Hi there - just notied that you have added Chadwell Heath to the LB of Havering Category. Could you please let me know why - I can find no reference to any part of Chadwell Heath falling within Havering (although it is clearly adjacent). DaveK@BTC (talk) 08:45, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- 'Cause Chadwell Heath is postal part (RM6) of Romford... and if you see around in Chadwell Heath there is a lot of Havering based offices. - kgyt (talk) 10:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Mmmm, postal codes, of course, are totally different to local authority boundaries and commerce doesn't make it a part of London Borough of Havering either. I had thought that there might eb amsll part of Chadwell Heath that was actually in the electoral boundaries (as is the case with Redbridge). On this basis I feel it would be better to NOT have Chadwell Heath in teh LB of Havering Category. Do you agree? DaveK@BTC (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
- Ok. - kgyt (talk) 01:16, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- Mmmm, postal codes, of course, are totally different to local authority boundaries and commerce doesn't make it a part of London Borough of Havering either. I had thought that there might eb amsll part of Chadwell Heath that was actually in the electoral boundaries (as is the case with Redbridge). On this basis I feel it would be better to NOT have Chadwell Heath in teh LB of Havering Category. Do you agree? DaveK@BTC (talk) 14:08, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Check out the Jesus article and edit it to keep it focused on Jesus and a biographical account of Him. Watch the Jesus page to keep it focused on Him. Thank you. Scifiintel 22:39, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
New Userbox
Hi, Kgyt! This is just to let you know that there is a new Protestant Christian userbox that's available. You can find it here. -- P.B. Pilhet 23:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks, see my user page... – kgyt 00:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Proposed Baptist group
There now is a proposed project to deal specifically with articles relating to Baptists at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Baptists. If you would be interested in joining such a group, please indicate as much by adding your name there. Thank you. John Carter 19:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
In your eyes, as one of the members of the Baptist work group, should this article be included in the scope of the project, and/or any baptist related categories, or not? Please response at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Anabaptist work group#Spiritual Baptist. Thank you. John Carter 22:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of Szigetszentmiklos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Szigetszentmiklos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.
- If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}
to somewhere on your talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:32, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
File permission problem with File:György Károly poet.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:György Károly poet.jpg, which you've sourced to Károly György Tamás's own gallery.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
- make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
- Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones (Talk) 21:40, 22 December 2011 (UTC)
- I am Károly György Tamás. I am the owner. The license is CC-BY-SA. What is the problem? – kgyt (talk) 00:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Ichthus: January 2012
ICHTHUS |
January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here
Canon EOS film camera tepmplate
Hey man, I responded to your question for thoughts about your additions to the Canon film SLR template. Check it out on the talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.174.85 (talk) 20:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks, I will see… – kgyt (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
Great job!
The Canon EOS Film page looks awesome man. Thanks for updating! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Catclaw666 (talk • contribs) 23:38, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks. I am in love… this cameras… :-) – kgyt (talk) 00:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Kgyt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Kgyt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
File copyright problem with File:Mensa-Member-logo.png
Thank you for uploading File:Mensa-Member-logo.png. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.
If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- @Marchjuly:, Ok. Thanks. – kgyt (talk) 01:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kgyt. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |