User talk:Kgroot

Welcome!

Hello, Kgroot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. JarrahTree 02:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Visual arts has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Visual arts was changed by Kgroot (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880379 on 2016-04-05T03:00:45+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:213 Valentines (Book) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:213 Valentines (Book). Thanks! MahenSingha (Talk) 21:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 213 Valentines (Book) (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft does not yet show whether the subject meets the book inclusion criteria. Generally this requires citing multiple non-trivial published reviews of the book. They should be from reliable sources that are independent of the book and its publisher. If such sources do not exist, then the subject is likely not ready for its own Wikipedia article at this time. Thanks,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:213 Valentines (Book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

/wiae /tlk 23:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Kgroot, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! /wiae /tlk 23:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:213 Valentines (Book)

Hello, Kgroot. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "213 Valentines".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Zupotachyon Ping me (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]