User talk:Keyboardplaya
regarding Pat Brown (Criminal Profiler)
[edit]You may wish to edit this article with an eye towards removing some of the POV statements. While I agree that Ms. Brown is not particualry well-informed, Wikipedia is supposed to be a neutral encyclopedia. If you want to show that she isn't an FBI trained profiler, you can do that in a neutral way by simply stating what degrees she really does hold and what background she does have. You could say something along the lines of "Ms. Brown describes herself as a Criminal Profiler and as such she appears frequently on the cable news channels offering her expert opinions on crimes in the news. However, unlike Cliff Van Zandt, RObert Ressler and John Douglas, who also appear on such shows in their capacity as Profilers, Ms. Brown has no history of service with any law enforcement agency either State, County, Municipal or Federal." See how that kinda of gets the point across?
Just put her credentials up as they are and let the readers decide is she's qualified. if she's made some seriously outragious statements,m and it appears she has, you can include some of them but keep them brief and make sure you cite the references. Don't characterize them in any way yourself but if other notable people have called them outragious, then cite that person. You could say "On such and such date, Pat brown said of such and such person or crime... blah blah blah." You can then go on to say "This statement was called ___ by name of notable person." By the way, refering to her as a talking head isn't negative or postive, it is merely descriptive which is why I sued it on the disambiguation page.
Good luck with the article. Remember, articles without cited sources often get nominated for deletion. it also helps to wikilink where appropriateLiPollis (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
- Further to this discussion, here is a link to an article about a book by Brent Truvey, another self-described criminal profiler. At least Truvey is attempting, in his book, to suggest that some set of standards be applied to the growing field. You might find this an interesting read:
- this should give you some ideas for the article. LiPollis (talk) 00:53, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rat Day.jpg)
[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Rat Day.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:27, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Orphaned non-free media (Image:061508 16221.jpg)
[edit] Thanks for uploading Image:061508 16221.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:56, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
){kind=link}
Proposed deletion of Pitts-burgher
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Pitts-burgher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
- Unremarkable sandwich (see WP:NOTABILITY and WP:V)
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:35, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Pitts-burgher
[edit]
I have nominated Pitts-burgher, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pitts-burgher. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)