User talk:Kevoras

Hello Kevoras, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of Contents

Department directory

Need help?

Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles
The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Kevoras, good luck, and have fun. --Adrian (talk) 11:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Worldcoin for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Worldcoin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldcoin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Citation Needed | Talk 00:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection[edit]

You have driven me to make a request for page protection on the basis of you disrupting the editorial process. Citation Needed | Talk 14:08, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree. but really it is protection from you. It is you that's removing facts and common knowledge? KR 14:11, 29 January 2014 (UTC) I am suspecting you need update on your knowledge bank? Worldcoin is #8 in market cap, and traded in ALL exchanges, whereby Ripple, Namecoin, Primecoin is MUCH MUCH less. I would like to understand what you 'think' is noteable or not, I have shown you websites already, should I list them out again for your easy reading? KR 14:14, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:10, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Abuse from bully editors self proclaiming to be established.[edit]

I have no idea what you're trying to pull. I would really stop accusing established editors of various things if I were you. Citation Needed | Talk 15:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

you call yourself... ""established editors"" not the way you are refusing to talk about subjects. It is you that I am not sure what you doing. and appears to be vandalism out of spite and pride. I welcome talk and discussion anytime, as for now, how about you stop the immature talks, and begin discussion on crypto? and what is actually noteable and what not? I know you like to pull Non-noteable as that's your ace card, but I have already shown you links from 3rd party and a market cap that cannot be lied. Would you like to come clean on why you refuse to accept top10 Crypto, but accept names like Ripple and Primecoin? I would like to see how much you know in this area. As you obviously don't like me (don't know why), may I suggest we invite a few others to join the chat? this will help the topic to be non-biased, and that is what wikipedia is about, dont you think? KR 15:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Contact me.[edit]

Obviously you're a little upset here. How about you contact me at AB5345@hotmail.com and we can talk about it off site so we don't cause any unwanted disruption. I know you're a new editor, and I might've been a little hard on you, but I'm really willing to help you here. Citation Needed | Talk 17:14, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Cryptocurrency. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:52, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kevoras (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I accept the block. However I wish for the admin to actually look at who is actually forcing content without discussion, and it wasn't me, I was trying to discuss but the other party kept refusing to discuss and shutting down information, and infact issued me a threatening warning, I was just adding what is correct, and the other user refuses to discuss, with questionable intent. That's all I have to say. KR 12:39, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. Please don't abuse this template. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've extended this block to indefinite for abusing multiple accounts, per the findings of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kevoras. Mark Arsten (talk) 22:57, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kevoras (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe there are some mistake here. USer fafasiu is my spouse, but we act on separate basis, the other users I don't even know. I will ask for a review if possible. KR 00:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The evidence at the sockpuppet investigation clearly ties these accounts together as being operated by the same person. only (talk) 11:54, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.