User talk:Kevin Joseph Brady

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Kevin Joseph Brady (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I completely understand why I must look like some terrible vandal but as a regular user but never before contributor to Wikipedia I took some umbrage at one of the newer articles on the Did You Know...section. Upon reading the article it struck me merely as an advertisement for a restaurant in NYC which in my understanding was outside the remit of Wikipedia. I checked out the What Wikipedia Is Not section and it seemed clear that articles about small/local businesses are generally not acceptable. I deleted a large amount of information that only served to promote the restaurant (providing it's reviews, listings of items from the menu, celebrity endorsements etc) and left a basic passage providing its location and the fact that it was a restaurant in NYC. I apologise unreservedly if I'm somehow mistaken but it was my intention to protect Wikipedia which whilst I haven't edited before I do use on a daily basis and love dearly. If I've got it wrong I promise to be much more careful and do intend to start contributing to Wikipedia where I feel I have something informative to share. In retrospect maybe I should have left it to a more experienced user to edit the article. For reference it was the article about Clinton St Baking Company & Restaurant. Also, I should point out I'm neither in NYC (rather London) and don't work in the restaurant trade. In short - I'm not actually a vandal.

Accept reason:

I accept that you were acting in good faith and have unblocked you. Another editor has also expressed concern over the quality of that article, for what it is worth. Please let us know if you still cannot edit, but I think I have cleared all the autoblocks. Cheers! Syrthiss (talk) 12:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Kevin Joseph Brady, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Syrthiss (talk) 12:22, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with Syrthiss' analysis, and would've unblocked you had I been quicker. That said, let me offer one additional piece of advice - talk it over first. Lots and lots of what goes on at Wikipedia takes place on talk pages - each article and user has one, and there are some for the project as a whole. If you see something major that needs to be changed, don't be shy about discussing it. Chances are good you're correct, and other editors may even pop over to assist you. While it's good to remove bad material as quickly as possible, usually it can wait a little while - best to be sure. Post a {{helpme}} tag on this page if you need further assistance, and happy editing. Best, UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 12:25, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kevin, while blanking the article isn't the best way to go about things, I agree with your concerns (and those raised by the other editors here) and have removed the prose I considered to be most like an advertisement from the article, though the whole thing really needs a re-write. I've started a discussion of this at Talk:Clinton St. Baking Company & Restaurant which you may want to participate in. Welcome to Wikipedia by the way! Nick-D (talk) 12:27, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lizzie Clachan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lizzie Clachan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 23:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lizzie Clachan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lizzie Clachan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizzie Clachan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 19:28, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]