User talk:KetinPorta
Hi, welcome to Wikipedia. Please see our guideline at WP:WEB for articles on websites. The existence of Jugopedia isn't in question, it's its notability. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:15, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- So, what are the levels of notability for ranking in your magnanimous opinion?
- Did you read the link I provided? And please don't be snarky. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- So if I remove the "jugopedia" name and rename it "Jugo" and rearrange the content, it does change. In our site we don't care about the site, instead, we care about the "jugo".
- How would you do that? How would you create an article about "Jugo" which is not just a Spanish language version of Juice? User:Zoe|(talk) 22:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- If you read the content of the article you wanna delete, you'll find out that "jugo" is not about the extract of certain fruits, but a different concept, and it deserves the non-translated "jugo" because its wide usage as a colloquialism in Chile.
- How would you do that? How would you create an article about "Jugo" which is not just a Spanish language version of Juice? User:Zoe|(talk) 22:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
- So if I remove the "jugopedia" name and rename it "Jugo" and rearrange the content, it does change. In our site we don't care about the site, instead, we care about the "jugo".
- Did you read the link I provided? And please don't be snarky. User:Zoe|(talk) 21:37, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
What's the notoriety of this wikipedia allowed article? [1] Kamelopedia
- We frequently hear arguments along the lines of "Why do you want to delete this? It's not the worse article here, look at these other ones." Experienced editors don't tend to find such arguments compelling- one bad article does not justify another. That said, if there are other websites that don't look verifiable or significant, feel free to nominate them for deletion. A good rule of thumb is, if reliable third-party sources are not discussing it, it's not a topic we can include in the encyclopedia. Friday (talk) 19:11, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Then now I can publish it again, because a third party (you) is discusing the matter. Deleting only some articles violates the NPOV. KetinPorta 19:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- No, that's not it at all- I am not a reliable source. Take a look at WP:V- this explains "verifiability", a key concept here. My talking about it on a talk page is not at all a third party reliable source. We specifically do not use usenet or forum posts as sources, nor do we use personal websites. It is possible to introduce bias by giving some topics coverage where others lack it, but the issue here seems to be verifiability and significance. There's one kind of bias that we have on purpose- we are biased toward topics that are covered in reliable sources. This is an inescapable part of being an encyclopedia, so it's not a bias that we try to overcome. Friday (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'll wait a week for the editors to delete the articles of the Kamelopedia and the Wickerpedia. I understand the matter of notoriety, but I find the lack of NPOV a personal offense. If you take responsability in edit the Wikipedia, you can't overlook some articles in the same category of the one you deleted.
- That's a nice theory, but in practice, we edit one article at a time. Wikipedia isn't consistant, as much as we might like it to be. Friday (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Nobody forced you to take the responsability. The articles that I mention were older than mine.
- That's a nice theory, but in practice, we edit one article at a time. Wikipedia isn't consistant, as much as we might like it to be. Friday (talk) 19:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'll wait a week for the editors to delete the articles of the Kamelopedia and the Wickerpedia. I understand the matter of notoriety, but I find the lack of NPOV a personal offense. If you take responsability in edit the Wikipedia, you can't overlook some articles in the same category of the one you deleted.
- No, that's not it at all- I am not a reliable source. Take a look at WP:V- this explains "verifiability", a key concept here. My talking about it on a talk page is not at all a third party reliable source. We specifically do not use usenet or forum posts as sources, nor do we use personal websites. It is possible to introduce bias by giving some topics coverage where others lack it, but the issue here seems to be verifiability and significance. There's one kind of bias that we have on purpose- we are biased toward topics that are covered in reliable sources. This is an inescapable part of being an encyclopedia, so it's not a bias that we try to overcome. Friday (talk) 19:38, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
- Then now I can publish it again, because a third party (you) is discusing the matter. Deleting only some articles violates the NPOV. KetinPorta 19:25, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Animalvegetablemineralman.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Animalvegetablemineralman.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:04, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Mento01.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Mento01.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
License tagging for Image:Misterjones.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Misterjones.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Doom Patrol images
[edit]Copyrighted images are used on wikipedia under American fair use law and wikipedia's policies regarding said fair use law. This means they are only to be displayed within articles, nbot on talk pages or anywhere else. If the images you uploaded do not get used within articles, unfortunately they will be deleted, as per WIkipedia:Fair use and deletion policy. The list you created has not been removed, it has merely been commented out. It needs to be reformatted to prevent the images displaying, something I will attend to as soon as I can. I apologise for the concern I caused you. Steve block Talk 15:43, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely clear on what you mean. All images should be displayed in an article, or they will be deleted. Copyrighted images used under fair use provisions should not be displayed anywhere but in an article. I appreciate you are trying to help by uploading these images, but it could lead to Wikipedia faing legal sanctions. That is why the images have been removed from the talk page. Steve block Talk 19:04, 25 May 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Beastboy01.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Beastboy01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:17, 2 June 2006 (UTC)
Image Tagging for Image:Generalimmortus01.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Generalimmortus01.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:22, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Orphaned fair use image (Image:Animalvegetablemineralman.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Animalvegetablemineralman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJTalk 23:27, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Aliastheblur.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Aliastheblur.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 20:13, 30 November 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Aliastheblur.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Aliastheblur.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Loveglove.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Loveglove.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Misternobody.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Misternobody.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 19:50, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thequiz.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Thequiz.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 07:09, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Thefog.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Thefog.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sleepwalk.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Sleepwalk.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:28, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Agentexc.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Agentexc.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fever01.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Fever01.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:34, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Frenzy03.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Frenzy03.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Dannythestreet.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dannythestreet.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:34, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Fever01.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Fever01.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 9 March 2020 (UTC)