Jump to content

User talk:Keronica Grant/sandbox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

[edit]
Name of student reviewer Wikipedia User:Joselv83
Date of review 5/9/2013
Name of editor Wikipedia User: Keronica_Grant
URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant
Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/9/13
Date review submitted to instructor 05/9/13
Length of edit (too long/too short) Good Length
Image (needed/appropriate) N/A
Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate
Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A
Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate to I/O Psych
Wikiformatting Good Formatting.
Grammar & composition Good Grammar.
Other comments Good job overall!

Joselv83 (talk) 17:13, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Feedback

[edit]

Name of student reviewer: Christina GeoHaghan Christina geo

Date of review: 5/3/13

Name of editor: Keronica Grant Keronica_Grant

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 2/13/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 4/30/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): too long

Image (needed/appropriate): Not needed

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes

Wikiformatting: multiple sentences, correct grammar and punctuation

Other comments:

--Christina geo (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Name of student reviewer **Replace with username for version on talk page** Wikipedia User: DJames5

Date of review- 5/6/13

Name of editor**Replace with username for version on talk page**- Keronica Grant

URL of editor’s Userpage- http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Keronica_Grant/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page- 5/6/13

Date review submitted to instructor- 5/6/13

Length of edit (too long/too short)- Too long

Image (needed/appropriate)- n/a

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit)- Yes

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed- Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)- Yes

Wikiformatting- Good

Grammar & composition- Good

Other comments- None

DJames5 (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

[edit]

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback Name of student reviewer: Trinirebel (talk) 16:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Date of review 05/06/2013

Name of editor: Keronica_Grant

URL of editor’s Userpage http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Keronica_Grant

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page 05/06/2013

Date review submitted to instructor 05/06/2013

Length of edit (too long/too short) Appropriate length of edit

Image (needed/appropriate) None applicable for this edit

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit) Accurate information provided directly from text the text book

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych) Accurate information provided

Wikiformatting Exemplary formatting

Grammar & composition Grammar and spelling were error free

Other comments Exemplary edit. Trinirebel (talk) 16:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]