User talk:Kermit2

Welcome!

Hello, Kermit2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 01:33, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

Wikipedia:Meetup/Tampa -- You're invited! Hires an editor (talk) 01:35, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the Minneapolis Institute of Art

Minneapolis Institute of Art edit-a-thon

Date: Saturday, October 24, 2015, 12pm–4pm
Location: Minneapolis Institute of Art Friends Community Room, 2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis
Sponsor: Minneapolis Institute of Art

You are invited to attend an Art+Feminism edit-a-thon at Minneapolis Institute of Art which will be held on Saturday, October 24, 2015. This editing event is dedicated to improving and increasing the presence of cultural, historic, and artistic information on Wikipedia pertaining to women artists.

For more information and to RSVP: → click here ←, you may register online for the event or call (612) 870-6323

--gobonobo ⁺ ^c 20:14, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kermit2. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup invitation

Hello. Here's an event happening soon. Might you be able to make it? Jonathunder (talk) 01:41, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the area? You're invited to a
Minnesota Wikipedia Meetup

	Saturday, December 17, 2016
	Meet in the MIA Main Lobby at 1 p.m.
	2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis

St. Cloud, April 15, 2017: Wikipedia as Social Activism

Please come and join if you can!

In the area? You're invited to
Wikipedia as Social Activism

	Saturday, April 15, 2017
	St. Cloud State University Library at noon
	720 4th Avenue South, St. Cloud

Shaded0 (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kermit2. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DevSecOps (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The decision at Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2018 November 6 was to allow the draft to be improved (i.e. find better sources), then bring back to DRV for another review. Instead, no non-trivial changes were made and this was resubmitted. Until better sources are found, this isn't going to get approved.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DevSecOps and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DevSecOps, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 01:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kermit2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 01:22, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kermit2. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meetup

Hello. Nice meeting you on Saturday. If there's anything I can do to help here, let me know. Jonathunder (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You too. Thanks for coming to the meetup. I was actually looking for guidance on how to get https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:DevSecOps approved. Thanks, Kermit2 (talk) 17:21, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The last version of the deleted page DevSecOps (which I realize you can't see, but I can) is a pretty good start. Franky, I'm baffled as to why it was deleted. It has 11 inline citations to what appear to be reliable sources, and it doesn't appear to be promotional. I think I could move that to a sandbox and people can polish it up until it's ready to go live. (I'm really not a fan of the draft article purgatory, though it can be useful for holding back crap, which this is not.) Let me know if you want it in your sandbox or mine. Jonathunder (talk) 20:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds as good as my draft. You can move it to mine if it looks better than my stub, though I'm not sure what the next steps are after that. Please outline them or link me to some, or I can probably figure it out once we're past the salting part. Thanks!! Kermit2 (talk) 20:24, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go: User:Kermit2/DevSecOps. I would suggest revising it to give context for a nonspecialist, like me. Perhaps more general sources might help. It also needs wikilinks to terms it mentions and some formatting to make it look like a Wikipedia article. Jonathunder (talk) 20:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as sources, you might start here. I don't know enough about the subject matter to select sources, but I can definitely help format things if you need it. Jonathunder (talk) 20:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

As far as the process, I think the least frustrating path will be to make the draft really good, so that it would be crazy to delete it, and then we can break some rules. Jonathunder (talk) 22:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I consolidated my draft with the one you moved into my sandbox and removed a lot of references to devsecops.org which is probably what made people think it was promotional. I was originally just trying to get a stub out, like when I started https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=OpenHPC&oldid=802703705 which has now been expanded on by various editors to everyone's benefit so I wasn't expecting a lot of resistance as I encountered none there. Please let me know if there's anything else we need to allow people to contribute. Once in the main space I'll get some links in to it from pages where appropriate.

User:Kermit2/DevSecOps is now a decent start but needs more content. I've started things in article space with much less, and normally would move this there at this stage, but since it was deleted before I think it should be developed more first so there's less risk of it being deleted again. Is more of the content in the old article usable? Jonathunder (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have access to this paper? Jonathunder (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have access to that paper. I will add more content. Kermit2 (talk) 02:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Email

Hey. In answer to your question: I used my sysop magic. Regards, El_C 00:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, cool. If you scroll up on this page you can see some chat about it. i even went to a Wikipedia meetup to try to get it unblocked. This is the draft I had User:Kermit2/DevSecOps. Do you think I should move it to the page you just unblocked? Kermit2 (talk)

Oh, wow. I'm sorry, but this isn't a subject with which I am familiar. Probably best to gauge folks at Talk:DevOps before doing anything, though. El_C 01:56, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kermit2, let me try to explain better. I considered leaving the protection for the redirect at admin level instead of WP:ECP, with a note telling users to get a WP:DRAFT approved first, but in the end judged that to be a bit heavy handed. Anyway, so a draft could be an option, though, again, getting the feel of the room at Talk:DevOps first would be the intuitive thing to start with. HTH! El_C 11:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]