Jump to content

User talk:Kenosis247

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Kenosis247, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 19:29, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kenosis247, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Kenosis247! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Combined oral contraceptive pill

[edit]

Hi, you are currently engaged in an WP:editwar at this page, where you are trying to include information that other editors consider improper. You have already reverted four times which is a violation of the socalled "three revert rule" which says that no editor may revert more than three times, and that reverting more is a valid cause for one's account to be blocked. I think you are probably a new editor and unaware of these rules, so don't worry. What you need to do at this point is to go to the discussion page and write why you think including the material is important. Then if there is a consensus among the editors to include it it will be included, and if there isn't it will not, or perhaps there can be established a consensus to include it in another form. The problem I see with the material you include is that you are basing it on a very new study published as a primary source. In medical topics we have a very strict policy of sourcing and we only accept the highest quality of secondary sources as laid out in WP:MEDRS. This is because primary studies contradicting well established medical views are published all the time, and most of them turn out to be wrong and are not accepted as valid in the literature. Therefore we do not include new medical studies, untill they have been met with general acceptance in the field. This is in order to avoid giving people problematic medical advice, since many people rely on wikipedia for nderstanding illnesses and treatments. Ergo, we only include medical studies that have been generally accepted as valid by the profession.User:Maunus ·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 18:27, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Donald Wallenfang has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Donald Wallenfang. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:58, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Wallenfang (May 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 17:59, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Wallenfang (June 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
-- RoySmith (talk) 17:23, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Donald Wallenfang has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Donald Wallenfang. Thanks! Catrìona (talk) 20:48, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Wallenfang (August 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Newslinger was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Newslinger talk 15:48, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Donald Wallenfang (November 1)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 18:29, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Donald Wallenfang

[edit]

Draft:Donald Wallenfang, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Donald Wallenfang and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Donald Wallenfang during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 18:33, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Donald Wallenfang, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Donald Wallenfang

[edit]

Hello, Kenosis247. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donald Wallenfang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:42, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]