User talk:Kennster2012
I suggest visiting the editing tutorial.
Salma Vian (talk) 20:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
June 2012[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Atlantic Records, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Atlantic Records was changed by Kennster2012 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962514 on 2012-06-07T00:57:21+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:57, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Not very professional, are you?[edit]
You say you're a web designer, but you are most certainly NOT professional. Now knock it off before I block you. --MuZemike 00:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
- I gave you a chance, but you have spent it. Permanently blocked. --MuZemike 01:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
Dear MuZemike,[edit]
I am sorry about doing that. I didn't mean to. I just wanted to try out Weird Al Yankovics' prank as White & Nerdy. Can you please unblock me? I won't do anything anymore to Atlantic Records wikipage.
-Kennster2012
- Per our little conversation we had via email, I have unblocked you. However, please be aware that, if you disrupt the encyclopedia like that again, you will be re-blocked. --MuZemike 17:49, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
MuZemike[edit]
Thank You So Much! I won't do what I did ever again!
-Kennster2012
Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Kennster2012/Old School Manor (Portland, MI) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Old School Manor (Portland, MI), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 22:35, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Figure It Out (Revival)[edit]
First, watch your tone, "Kennster". Second, you created an ALREADY existing article. You should've used the original article to improve it, not create a duplicate article. Platinum Star (talk) 22:51, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry about that, I was mad at the time. Now, I am fine. Sorry about that. You are right. Sorry --Kennster2012 (talk) 23:30, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Old School Manor (Portland, MI).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 22:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment on Muzemike's page[edit]
I saw your note on User Talk:MuZemike about being an admin. I just thought I'd drop you a little note to put adminstrating into perspective. First, in the past half a dozen years, no one has ever become an admin with less than 3000 edits, and the overwhelming majority of successful admin candidates have over 10,000. I, myself, waited until I had more than 20K to run. Additionally, most successful candidates have been editing Wikipedia for at least a year, often several years. In order to determine is someone would be a good admin, we need to see evidence of your editing behavior that shows that you 1) have the appropriate skills and behavior, and 2) understand Wikipedia's policies to a great degree. There's simply no way to tell that without seeing a large history. Additionally, since you were blocked, you're going to need to work extra hard and long to prove that you can handle the tools.
Finally, I'd just like to add one thing: being an admin is really not something to strive for. It just gives you a few extra tools (ability to protect pages, block users, and the trust to close contentious discussions). It's really just more work. Yes, Wikipedia needs admins. I'm glad to be one, but not because it makes me more powerful or something (it doesn't), but because it's something I can do for Wikipedia.
All of that being said, if you need help learning how to be a productive Wikipedian, please feel free to ask me. If you really do still think that you want to be an admin some day, the first thing you should do is start improving articles by editing them, because, after all, that's the main reason we're all (supposed to be) here. Qwyrxian (talk) 03:19, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Qwyrxian, Ok I will try harder with my articles I create and also sorry about the Atlantic Records thing I just wanted to try to be like Weird Al Yankovic and be white and Nerdy. What is your email for questions? --Kennster2012 (talk) 19:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- Just leave me a message in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. It's generally better to conduct conversations about Wikipedia on the site--often other people will join conversations and provide more info. For example, if you had just been emailing MuzeMike, I never would have seen your comment and provided this advice here. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)