Jump to content

User talk:Kennedy, 007

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Kennedy, 007! I am Endofskull and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Endofskull (talk) 03:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Kennedy, 007. You have new messages at Endofskull's talk page.
Message added 20:27, 21 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

August 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Talk:WWF SmackDown! 2: Know Your Role has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. · Andonic Contact 02:05, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quite sorry about that, didn't notice you were archiving, I was using huggle. =/ Cheers mate. · Andonic Contact 02:08, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Kennedy, 007. You have new messages at Endofskull's talk page.
Message added 02:12, 29 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

Elockid (Talk) 12:26, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kennedy, 007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked but I am not too sure what to say in this sense.

Decline reason:

Not much you can say. CheckUser confirmed that you are indeed the same as Whitmore8621, who has been blocked indefinitely. Favonian (talk) 13:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request 2

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kennedy, 007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok well, I will do anything anybody wants because I have spent my life as a servant somewhat and also considering my privacy was invaded and also I have not committed any crimes other than arching material for the last week.

Decline reason:

this account is a check-user confirmed sockpuppet of Whitmore 8621 (talk · contribs). Any unblock request must be made for that account, on its talk page, and must address the reasons why it was blocked. JohnCD (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Unblock request 3

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kennedy, 007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I believe that a relative in my house has been vandalizing pages and used the account name Whitmore 8621 and then I created my own account and that relative got my password. I would really like to be unblocked I will do anything anyone wishes. Kennedy, 007--Kennedy, 007 (talk) 09:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It's quite obvious that you are the same person, and frankly, I'm hurt that you think I'm stupid enough to believe this. If you think you've completely solved the problems that made your block necessary, take a break from Wikipedia - one week for each account you've used is a good rule of thumb- then make your request, with a clear explanation of what you've learned and what you'll do differently, on your original talk page. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:05, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


Unblock Request 4

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kennedy, 007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well I would incredibly like to be unblocked but then again I have done most of the work I wanted to do and so fourth besides its wikipedia, No point into getting into a silly edit war over nothing and considering the trouble I have caused supposedly but then again the certain user Eaglestorm who reported to to check user he has tried to ruin everything that i edit on wikipedia in any from or the other and he gets away with just like that and Im the villain I would suggest if Im blocked or not give him a warning about his behavior to future users and tell him to stop using profanity and also to stop causing trouble for people. He has already helped get one user blocked

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Smashvilletalk 13:33, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request 5

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kennedy, 007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Like the list above says i will not cause disruption at all I guarantee that, I will be constructive with editing. I do not need to be told what is right or wrong I admit I did wrong but I do think I was being treated harshly as well by some wikipedia users. Most of my contributions have not been destructive in a sense.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts; created another just today. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:32, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Request 6

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kennedy, 007 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I promise not to abuse multiple accounts ever again but It unlikely I will be unblocked so for the time being. If there wrre requirements from Wikipedia that i was told to do or obey what are they?

Decline reason:

These are the same arguments you've used time and time again. There is a point at which we have to stop giving you second, third, fourth, or tenth chances. This is it. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 14:50, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


I have removed your talkpage access. This is beyond the pale and you have already been denied 6 times. --Smashvilletalk 15:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]