User talk:KenGohan

Hello, I'm Arjayay. Your recent edit to the page Vedalam appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mohanlal

I've reverted your additions to this article per WP:PUFFERY. Wikipedia is written from a neutral tone of voice. Overtly positive, subjective appraisals of an actor's status are rarely regarded as acceptable. Please read the guideline and policy I've linked above. If you have questions, please feel free to let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:03, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ken, I'm noticing this as well. Your burst of edits here, here and here and here introduce quite a bit of interpretive content (specifically your personal opinions) and some really fluffy language, like the use of statements like "His Conventional Acting Style with perfection" and words like "blockbuster" or "superstar" or "reigning king". We don't regurgitate subjective declarations like "blockbuster" "super hit", "failure", "flop", "disaster", "all time super blockbuster status", etc. because these are opinions, and we do not present opinions as facts. Wikipedia is a neutral encyclopedia, so we have to keep our language neutral, so we don't sound like we're promoting or drooling over article subjects. There are other problems too, like in this edit, where you jammed a bunch of content right before a reference, so that reference got moved really far from the content that it was supporting. This is not helpful. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:51, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And this edit was blatantly false information and directly contradicts the information provided in the sources. This is nothing but pure vandalism. KenGohan, if you continue on this path, it is highly likely you will be blocked from editing. I don't know what your motivation is in editing these articles, but tearing down that which you don't like while puffing up that which you do is flat out not acceptable behavior here. If you continue in this behavior, it will not end well for your editing here. If there's any part of this which isn't clear, then by all means ask. If you are uncertain about an edit, then ask before making it. Consider this a level 3 warning. If you persist, there's just one more warning past this, and then you're blocked. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:09, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Mohanlal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Mohanlal was changed by KenGohan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921293 on 2017-10-13T20:26:11+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

Please don't add random websites like here, where you link to indianmoviestats.com. Just because a website exists doesn't mean that it is a legitimate source of accurate data. Anyone can start a website and publish whatever they want. Please stick to mainstream sources with established reputations for fact-checking and accuracy and please see WP:ICTF#Guidelines on sources for a general list of sites that are and are not considered sufficient in the context of Indian cinema articles. See also our reliable sourcing guidelines. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:58, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

Hello, I'm Arjayay. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Khaidi No. 150 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 20:24, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

November 2017

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Vijay filmography, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Booyahhayoob (talk) 20:31, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm TheFarix. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Black Clover, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 04:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Great Father, you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style and referencing

Considering your latest group of edits, please read Wikipedian editing policy and WP:CITE style. Also the box office numbers were cumulative for the whole week, not only for one movie.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 10:53, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please ([2]), start using citation style Template:Cite web and Template:Cite news.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 09:05, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again the same thing, please ([3]) learn how to properly cite references on English Wikipedia. Adding an url link is not enough. Read WP:REFDD, Wikipedia:Tutorial/Citing sources and WP:REFBEGIN.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 17:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Again ([4]) at List of Dragon Ball films. Note that blatant copying of text from non-Wikipedian sources is violation of WP:COPYVIO. If you continue to do such a serious violation you can get reported and blocked from editing Wikipedia.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 22:03, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Citation style

Hello, Thanks for leaving your edits on Dragon Ball Super: Broly. I just wanted to let you know that I reverted your edits. I removed them because those citations you added are not trustworthy and had bad referencing style. If you have any questions regarding the subject please feel free to ask in Talk: Dragon Ball Super: Broly. Please have a look in WP:Cite and Manual of Style(simplified).
Sincerely,
Masum Reza(talk) 00:35, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for leaving your edits in Dragon Ball Super: Broly. Although I must say you are repeating the same mistake. Please learn how to cite sources. Your previous edits have been improved by another user. Please have a look. If you have any questions feel free to ask in talk page. You can also ask questions in teahouse.
Sincerely,
Masum Reza(talk) 14:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Ball

Hi, just letting you know that we don't list IMDb ratings or audience scores on Wikipedia, those are not collected actual reviews from critics and can easily be manipulated. Also, I don't see the benefit of spliting up the films by categories like if they had Toryama involved or not. And having overly long info about average ratings is not really how a list like it should be made. See List of Marvel Cinematic Universe films for an example of how it should look in the reception section. Thanks. Happy editing.★Trekker (talk) 05:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

DO NOT COPY

"DO NOT COPY" is a basic concept in academia. The content you added here at Mersal (film) was copied the sources you used.[5][6] This is unacceptable, and you have previously been warned about this. Copying is intellectually dishonest and lazy, and constitutes intellectual theft. Plagiarism and copyright violations will not be tolerated at Wikipedia. If you can't summarise content in your own words in proper English, then you shouldn't be adding content like this. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Mersal (film), you may be blocked from editing. Diff: [7] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:21, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You should also be double-checking your work, as edits like this, where you (for whatever reason) delete the |gross= parameter and replace it with the non-existent |box office= parameter is totally pointless, since it results in no visible change on the page. Further, per MOS:LARGENUM and Template:Infobox film instructions, the level of specificity of "$25,775,371" is too much. The community prefers condensed values like "$25.8 million". Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:30, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Vadhu Doctoranu moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vadhu Doctoranu, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:40, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vadhu Doctoranu (2)

Hello, KenGohan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vadhu Doctoranu (2), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vadhu Doctoranu (2)

Hello, KenGohan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Vadhu Doctoranu".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:50, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]