User talk:Kemilliogolgi

Welcome!

Hello, Kemilliogolgi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kemilliogolgi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:56, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves

Hello, Kemilliogolgi,

Please do not move around pages multiple times. It gives the appearance that you don't know what you want or what you are doing. It can also be seen as disruptive editing and lead to a loss of editing privileges. Consider whether an article needs to be moved and, if so, move it once. Right now, you have created 7 or 8 redirects that are really unnecessary. Just don't move pages on a whim or without thoughtful consideration.

If you have any questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:01, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Kemilliogolgi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:02, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Merrut (December 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Merrut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 21:09, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Mughal–Rajput Wars, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mughal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Maratha invasion of Awadh, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mughal and Saadat Ali Khan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Durrani Campaign in Meerut (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Durrani Campaign in Meerut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 18:13, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Mahmud Shah of Jaunpur

added links pointing to Bhojpur, Jaunpur, Mahmudabad and Shahpur

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Gwalior (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More references needed. It is almost in the notable territory, but a few more sources, preferably online, should do it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Gwalior and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 04:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Capture of Kabbaldurga moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Capture of Kabbaldurga. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has too many problems of language or grammar. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:40, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regularly moving draft articles not ready for mainspace

Hi Kemilliogolgi, you have been moving draft articles from the AfC process out of the mainspace before they are ready. Your most recent move Jahangir's Mewar campaign had multiple issues and remaining AfC templates at the time of the move which you did not then correct. Previously when you moved Capture of Kabbaldurga, the reason you gave was "For further grammar enhancement": that is not a valid reason to move something to the mainspace — if it is not yet ready for the mainspace, do not move it and assume someone else will clean up your work.

When you requested reviews at Special:Diff/1195307364, you didn't even tag reviewers correctly. Consider the {{ping}} template carefully. Further, when submitting drafts, understand that there is a backlog and speed is not a priority when creating new articles. Presently, the template says Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 6 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 1,641 pending submissions waiting for review.

Please ensure you are only moving mainspace ready article to the mainspace and not works in progress. Remember, quality over quantity. Thanks, microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 17:41, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Kampili (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Siege of Kampili and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Samalkha (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Samalkha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jahangir's Mewar campaign (February 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission is not suitable for Wikipedia. Please read "What Wikipedia is not" for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Appears to be original research. Asked on the talk page, author can't identify where else it has been called Jahangir's Mewar campaign by other sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jahangir's Mewar campaign and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 14:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Recapture of Raichur Doab moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Recapture of Raichur Doab. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and article consists of an infobox only, with no content. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 13:45, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:Deccan-Vijayanagar Wars. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:39, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Gwalior has been accepted

Siege of Gwalior, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

zoglophie^•talk• 17:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deccan Sultanates-Vijayanagar Conflicts, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Venkata.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Talas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. Thank you for your work on Shahbaz Khan's invasions of Mewar. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 17:50, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Siege of Mandsaur. Narook (talk) 07:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Narook (talk) 08:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are just as wrong as they are @Narook 70.23.57.138 (talk) 14:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edits removed without suitable explaination

Hi @Kemilliogolgi You have reverted my edits without giving a suitable explaination.

Can you explain me how History of Mewar from Earliest time to 1751 Ad by R.V Somani is a source from WP: Raj as it was published in 1976. Rawn3012 (talk) 07:21, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kemilliogolgi Please go to Talk:Conquest of Ajmer and see the discussion there and respond Rawn3012 (talk) 03:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conquest of Mandalgarh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 11

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Sudsahab (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 16

@Kemilliogolgi I just noticed that you are adding irrelevant conflicts in this article which occurred in 1202 and nowhere related to Ghaznavids, Now I have to soundly verify each of your additions in the Campaign timeline section as you are adding irrelevant conflicts there so we can't just overlook you and your edits. Sudsahab (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you have cheaked the sources throughly.The source i have added there ,clearly states about the event.And the sources given by me are completely WP:RS.If there is any problem regarding with the sources than you must follow WP:BRD rather than engaging in an WP:EDITWAR.For better assistance I have added the quotation there.Hope it will help you.

Thanks!!! Kemilliogolgi (talk) 06:40, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. Thank you for your work on Prince Salim's Invasion of Mewar. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:38, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of battles in Rajasthan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Amar Singh and Mohi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Siege of Kampili has been accepted

Siege of Kampili, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Noorullah (talk) 07:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Kemilliogolgi. Thank you for your work on Siege of Kampili. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:16, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Kemilliogolgi. Thank you for your work on Battle of Sambalpur. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 15:16, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Capture of Kabbaldurga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Kabbaldurga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Kabbaldurga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based Kashmiri (talk) 05:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siege of Chittorgarh (1544) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Chittorgarh (1544) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Chittorgarh (1544) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based Kashmiri (talk) 05:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Siege of Channapatna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Siege of Channapatna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siege of Channapatna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based Kashmiri (talk) 05:49, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wars of the Deccan Sultanates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wars of the Deccan Sultanates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wars of the Deccan Sultanates until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based Kashmiri (talk) 06:23, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Battle of Sambalpur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Battle of Sambalpur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Sambalpur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based Kashmiri (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Capture of Kanchangarh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capture of Kanchangarh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capture of Kanchangarh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based Kashmiri (talk) 08:08, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Indus River

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Indus River, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Tirhut

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Tirhut, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Conquest of Hadoti

A tag has been placed on Conquest of Hadoti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:32, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Conquest of Mandalgarh

A tag has been placed on Conquest of Mandalgarh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:36, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siege of Panhala (1660)

A tag has been placed on Siege of Panhala (1660) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jajnagar Expendition of Firoz Shah Tughlaq

A tag has been placed on Jajnagar Expendition of Firoz Shah Tughlaq requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:40, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Conquest of Ajmer

A tag has been placed on Conquest of Ajmer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:41, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Conquest of Mandaran

A tag has been placed on Conquest of Mandaran requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siege of Kampili

A tag has been placed on Siege of Kampili requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:44, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Siege of Gwalior (1518)

A tag has been placed on Siege of Gwalior (1518) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:45, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Prince Salim's Invasion of Mewar

A tag has been placed on Prince Salim's Invasion of Mewar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shahbaz Khan's invasions of Mewar

A tag has been placed on Shahbaz Khan's invasions of Mewar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 08:48, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Devgiri

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Devgiri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Nandapur

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Nandapur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Second Battle of Nandapur

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Second Battle of Nandapur, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Umardan

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Umardan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:08, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Jajnagar

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Jajnagar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kemilliogolgi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I have been mistakenly identified as a sockpuppet of Adityanakul or Mohammad Umar Ali without proper investigation. I am a regular contributor to Wikipedia and value the platform greatly. Please conduct a thorough investigation and provide me with the opportunity to prove my innocence.Please recheck all the matter thoroughly and unblock my existing Wikipedia account

Decline reason:

You are confused. A proper investigation was performed at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohammad Umar Ali and you now have the opportunity to prove your innocence through the unblock process. Yamla (talk) 12:06, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Conquest of Mandaran for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conquest of Mandaran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquest of Mandaran until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 09:27, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Conquest of Hadoti for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conquest of Hadoti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conquest of Hadoti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Based.Kashmiri ^(🗨️) 10:21, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kemilliogolgi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The account Adityanakul isn't my sock account.Probably Either my account information got leaked or could be used by any other editor.Please try to recover my account.I will try to change my account password if there is any other opinions please suggest so that I can get my account back as it was earlier.I respect all the guidelines on Wikipedia. thanks!!! Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mohammad Umar Ali the conclusion of this discussion is probably wrong.Kemilliogolgi (talk) 02:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You seem to be saying that your account information has been made public, that means this account will need to remain blocked as it is now compromised. 331dot (talk) 16:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS

Five appeals at UTRS have been declined, most recently UTRS appeal #89659. JBW (talk) 10:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Faruknagar

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Faruknagar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Atai Khan's Attack on Meerut (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Atai Khan's Attack on Meerut and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 14:58, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ibrahim's Invasion of Rajputana

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ibrahim's Invasion of Rajputana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Siege of Sinhagad

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Sinhagad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:05, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Conquest of Devgiri

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Conquest of Devgiri, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 21 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Mahmud Shah Sharqi

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mahmud Shah Sharqi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:07, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ibrahim's Invasion of Rajputana

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ibrahim's Invasion of Rajputana".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Siege of Sinhagad

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Siege of Sinhagad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 10:39, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gajpati-Bengal Sultanate Wars

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gajpati-Bengal Sultanate Wars, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Conquest of Ajmer

The article Conquest of Ajmer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ha shid 08:11, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Bengal-Orissa Wars

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bengal-Orissa Wars, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Malwa-Orissa Conflicts

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Malwa-Orissa Conflicts, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gajpati-Bengal Sultanate Wars

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Gajpati-Bengal Sultanate Wars".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Golconda Sultanate-Orissa Wars

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Golconda Sultanate-Orissa Wars, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ahmed Shah II's Invasion of Mewar

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahmed Shah II's Invasion of Mewar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Malwa-Orissa Conflicts

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Malwa-Orissa Conflicts".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:44, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shahbaz Khan's invasions of Mewar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shahbaz Khan's invasions of Mewar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahbaz Khan's invasions of Mewar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ratnahastin (talk) 14:57, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Samalkha

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Samalkha, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Atai Khan's Attack on Meerut

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Atai Khan's Attack on Meerut, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Samalkha

Hello, Kemilliogolgi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Battle of Samalkha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jajnagar Expedition of Firoz Shah Tughlaq for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jajnagar Expedition of Firoz Shah Tughlaq is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jajnagar Expedition of Firoz Shah Tughlaq until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Garudam ^Talk! 22:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seige of Ajmer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seige of Ajmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seige of Ajmer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Garuda ^Talk! 16:19, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Seige of Ajmer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seige of Ajmer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seige of Ajmer (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Garuda ^Talk! 16:26, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you created or have recently made significant changes to, Prince Salim's Invasion of Mewar, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for pages, so it has been blanked and redirected. Three typical reasons for this are that: (1) the article's subject appears to fail our notability guidelines; (2) the article is unsourced; or (3) the sources used in the article are unreliable. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

Wikipedia:Your first article has more information about creating articles, and you may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Garuda ^Talk! 21:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]