User talk:Kemet

This message is regarding the article Kux. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. JoanneB 20:01, 4 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Pygmy changes

Hi, Kemet. Thanks for your recent edits to Pygmy. However, please be advised that it is Wikipedia policy to cite sources. This allows other users to check your facts. I'm leaving your changes for now (they appear okay on first glance), but don't take it personally if somone decides to revert them due to lack of references. See you around! —BrianSmithson 19:26, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bach style

I'm working on a replacement text; what's there now is dreadful twaddle. Tony 03:46, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've got a nerve. Keep off my page, or I'll report you. Tony 14:36, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cheer up

You may find these of interest.

Kemet, these are from User Giano, who uses his IP number when he makes contributions like this. You may wish to join his faction, which is doing its best to make trouble on whatever pages I'm on. I'm sure they'd love another member. Tony 09:31, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cabal mediation

Please see Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/3 01 2006 Johann Sebastian Bach and Talk:Johann Sebastian Bach#Cabal mediation for the ongoing mediation over the disputes at Johann Sebastian Bach. Thank you. --Cyde Weys _vote^talk 01:05, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Bourgeoisie

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. dewet|™ 05:31, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Signing your messages

Hi Kemet. Thanks for your comments at Talk:Neolithic Revolution; hopefully we can work out a helpful and factually accurate addition to the article. I'd like to remind you, though, to please sign your messages on the talk page with four tildes (~~~~), which adds your username and a timestamp. It makes for easier reading. Thanks. -- bcasterline • talk 15:42, 3 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Curtis

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tony_Curtis, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--DizFreak ^{talk Contributions} 17:05, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

African American

Would you please explain why you added the "contradiction" tag to African American? We've started a discussion at Talk:African American#Economic Status Contradiction Tag. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 23:00, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multiracial

Would you please explain why you put an "original research" banner at the top of Multiracial? You really should (a) use edit summaries and (b) use the Talk page to discuss your concerns, especially since the "original research" banner says "See the talk page for details." Thank you. — Malik Shabazz (Talk | contribs) 01:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creole language

My concerns here are similar to the preceding ones under Multiracial. You tagged the page Creole language with the {{Expert|date=March 2009}} and {{Refimprove|date=November 2007}} banners at the top without using edit summaries or the Talk page to motivate your objections even though the expert banner specifically indicates: "See the talk page for details." As it is, I am an expert on the subject under review and I have been giving this article the attention it needed to warrant the removal of the neutrality (disputed) banner. I have reverted your edit. I also note that all your messages on your User talk page are without exception highly critical of your interfering in other people's edits. Please use the sandbox for any other editing tests you want to do. Noula69 05:18, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Further to your message on my user page, I have posted my answer on the appropriate talk page. Noula69 10:29, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Honorary Whites

I have reverted some of your changes on this article as unwarranted under Wikipedia policies. The template Original research should not be applied without explanation on the appropriate talk page (which you havn't done) and should be removed if the reason for tagging the article is not readily apparent and no explanation given.

As it is, I will have to go through the trouble of reviewing all your contributions given the admittedly contested nature of your editing procedures. In the meantime, I would appreciate you refraining from doing any other edits. Thank you. Noula69 11:47, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]