User talk:Kellycya

Welcome

Hello, Kellycya! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Alankc (talk) 19:20, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Obsessed (song), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. MS (Talk|Contributions) 21:33, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Obsessed (song). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. This applies to the both of us. We cannot revert anymore. Go to the talk and start a discussion per WP:BRD MS (Talk|Contributions) 21:42, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Already Gone (Kelly Clarkson song)

I've reverted you (again), per WP:SONGS - particularly:

All articles on albums, singles or songs must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject....Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article, such as for the songwriter, a prominent album or for the artist who prominently performed the song. Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable. Notability aside, a separate article on a song is only appropriate when there is enough verifiable material to warrant a reasonably detailed article; articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album.

Already Gone has not been released, has not been ranked on national or significant music charts, has not won significant awards or honours, and has not been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups.

Re-add the article once the song is released - if it meets notability criteria at that point.

Cheers, TFOWR^{This flag once was red} 09:34, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Bpcdbpnmnmbn.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Bpcdbpnmnmbn.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image with an unknown source or an unknown copyright status which has been tagged as such for more than 7 days, and it still lacks the necessary information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Alankc (talk) 17:37, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Bpcdbpnmnmbn.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Bpcdbpnmnmbn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Icestorm815 • Talk 21:30, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jennifer Lopez (2009 section)

Your edits are not helpful. They have added nothing to the value or quality of the information in the article and it is for those reasons they have been reverted. Please read WP:verifiability and WP:disruptive as well as WP:tenditious. Be careful that your behaviour does not fall into the latter two otherwise you could face a ban from editing. Furthermore i would like to draw your attention to WP:crystal. Finally in the future it would be polite and appreciated if you could use a WP:edit summary when making alterations as this helps other editors to identify new changes made as well as seperate vandalism from general edits in good faith. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:37, 18 July 2009 (UTC))[reply]

AfD nomination of Shakira's third English studio album

An article that you have been involved in editing, Shakira's third English studio album, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shakira's third English studio album. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Pokerdance ^{(talk/contribs)} 22:00, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]