User talk:Kelli Broessel
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kelli Broessel, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Introduction
[edit]Hi Kelli! My name is Theresa Quaderer and I'm in your IAH class.--Theresaquaderer (talk) 23:36, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]Hi, Kelli -- welcome to Wikipedia! As Ian mentioned, the Teahouse is a great resource for new editors. But did you know that Wikipedia also has an extensive help library for common questions? Of course, if you run into a question or problem, you're always welcome to get in touch with me either by email or on my talk page. Happy editing! Fraudoktorkatie (talk) 14:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Beating Heart Cadaver Review - Mariah Beebe
[edit]Hi Kelli,
I loved reading about your topic in general. I found it very interesting to read about. I particularly liked how easy it was for me to understand your article. The medical terms were put simply and they were easy for me (a non-science person) to understand. I thought it was interesting to read about the different debates that are happening on your topic. I also thought your article had good flow and it was well written with good evidence to back up what you were saying.
I think that if you could improve anywhere in your article it would be just adding more research. I think it would be interesting to hear more about the pregnant women who were beating heart cadavers and if any of them were successful as beating heart cadavers. I think that if you were to go a little bit more in depth to your article it would be an improvement.
I think that from reading your article it has made me want to include more sources in mine and research mine more in-depth. I also think I could get more primary sources as opposed to secondary sources because that would help as well.
I really enjoyed reading your article!!!
Mariah Beebe
Peer Review Beating Heart Cadaver- Drew Amstutz
[edit]Hi Kelli,
Sorry for the late peer review It has been a busy week. I really like the idea of us peer reviewing each other articles because I learning so much new information! This is a great topic and something I have not put too much thought towards, but now it is definitely on my radar. I think it is an incredible concept that can safe lives. I really enjoyed what you added and I liked learning about the role of the anesthesiologist and the whole pathway of the reflexes. I think the next step for you would be to possibly go back through the article and see if there is anything you can change in terms of wording. I think maybe you could look up information about religion and this topic to see if there are any conflicting thoughts? Also, I think it would be interesting to know some stats about how many people go brain dead each year that become connected to a medical ventilator or something along those lines. I’m really curious to see how many people that have there organs donated, also donate there bodies to science and whether or not body farms will accept them if they aren’t intact or don’t have any organs. I think that’s something I can check out for my topic of putrefaction.
Overall I really like the topic and I can’t wait to see the final edit to it! I hope it goes well!
-Drew Amstutz2 (talk) 02:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)