User talk:Kellen/Archives/2014/April
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Kellen. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The article The Feederz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails WP:NMUSIC (and WP:GNG). Only noticed there's a problem because it's written in a promotional tone, offering interpretation and evaluation without citing any reliable sources at all (one is the band's website and a broken link to a forum). Since Wikipedia has a policy of no original research and verifiability, statements about what the band or its members are "known for," what's "infamous" or "controversial," the relevance of various -isms, etc. is defined by cited sources. I couldn't find the sources needed to improve the article, but PRODding rather than AFDing because if the article's current content is accurate (e.g. there has been "controversy" or it has been written about in relation to Situationism or detournement) then maybe there are sources that predate what I'm [not] finding.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Rhododendrites talk | 16:22, 18 April 2014 (UTC)