User talk:KeithLD

.

The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Inception (film) was changed by KeithLD (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888686 on 2010-11-29T05:09:23+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:09, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From one plot junkie to another

I admire the writing I've seen from you so far. If I can ever help out on a tricky plot let me know. Happy editing! Millahnna (talk) 09:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Answers to your questions

1. Heat: I'd say just go for it. The article is tagged as needing a shorter plot (and has been for almost a year) so you shouldn't get any major complaints. I'm sure there will be a few minor revisions after you drop it in but that's pretty normal.

2. Inception: Since it was so hard to get a plot in there to begin with, I'd wait a couple more days to see if any more editors have comments. There was a lot of disputing about the content of that section back when the film first came out so it's going to be a bit tricky. If the section still doesn't have a lot of response by Saturday or Sunday, my suggestion would be to drop a note on the talk page of the Wikipedia Film Project to ask for input from other editors to help form a consensus. I was actually planning on doing this myself if you didn't have any more feedback by then so you don't have to worry about it if you don't want.

3. Consensus in general: I have a feeling I'm not going to explain this very well (fair warning in advance). The time it takes to form consensus will vary greatly from article to article. With fiction related topics, the more room there is for interpretation of story elements, the trickier it is going to be (thus Inception, Shutter Island was another tricky one). You won't always need to ask on the talk page to change a section. Being bold in your editing is often advised. But if you plan to make a major change to an article that isn't tagged as having a problem, I would advise the talk page route just to avoid the hassle of an edit war. Likewise if your bold changes are challenged and reverted. It's something you sort of get a feel for as you work on stuff around the site.

4. Watching a page: When you edit a page, right below the edit summary box is a check box that says "watch this page". That's an easy way to follow a page when you're in the middle of making edits. Also, across the top of any page you should also see either a little star (by the read, edit, and history tabs) or something indicating a "watch this page" type of link (how this looks varies by skin). Click that and you're good to go; you'll see any changes to that page or its related talk page in your watchlist.

Did I forget anything? Millahnna (talk) 09:48, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hannibal

I just wanted to say that you did a great job with plot summary edit on Hannibal. I jumped the gun in reverting you the other day. Let me know if I can ever be of any assistance. ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 00:54, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Film Invitation

Thank you for your recent contributions to one of Wikipedia's film-related articles. Given the interest you've expressed by your edits, have you considered joining WikiProject Film? We are a group of editors dedicated to improving the overall quality of Wikipedia's film-related content. If you would like to join, simply add your name to the list of participants. We also have a number of regional and topical task forces that you may be interested in joining as well.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask at the project talk page. We look forward to working with you in the future! Erik (talk | contribs) 21:45, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, KeithLD. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, KeithLD. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]