Jump to content

User talk:Keith161

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Wjemather. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. wjematherplease leave a message... 09:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Further to this, please exercise discretion when adding information of this nature. I suggest limiting to deals that have demonstrated significance. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of press releases. Thanks. wjematherplease leave a message... 16:18, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|reason=Hello i see i have been blocked for being a sock puppet of an account i have no relation too, i would like to be unblocked please}

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Keith161 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to be unblocked as I have been blocked for being a sock puppet for an account I have nothing to do with. Please unblocked me

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppet, I will upgrade the block to reflect this. Yamla (talk) 11:34, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.