User talk:Kehlstein

April 2013

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 14:27, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kehlstein, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Kehlstein! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 19:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Even if you are the leader of the party you have no control over material on Wikipedia, and can not order Wikipedia to remove properly sourced content. Thomas.W (talk) 06:45, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Thomas.W (talk) 07:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About your comment about the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party

Hello, I'm Peter, a Wikipedia editor and administrator from Australia.
I notice that you have identified yourself here as Stephen Goodson, the leader of the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party of South Africa.
Wikipedia has very strong policies about material concerning living people. To start with, please see this section of the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy. This policy mandates that:

Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity, and must adhere strictly to all applicable laws in the United States, to this policy, and to Wikipedia's three core content policies:

If you have any concerns about the Wikipedia web-pages (called "articles" in Wikipedia jargon) about you or the party, generally you would start by raising them at the "talk pages" of the Stephen Goodson article (located here) and of the Abolition of Income Tax and Usury Party (located here).
In this particular case, you may wish to follow the contact details outlined here and here. Both these identify how to contact the Wikimedia Foundation which operates several online collaborative wiki projects including Wikipedia.
Please feel free to contact me with any further questions you might have. Pete aka --Shirt58 (talk) 13:58, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
For copyright reasons: WP:COPYWITHIN is asserted and applies here.

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kehlstein. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ - © - @ - Join WER 14:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear, the reason I chose an indef period instead of a week or two is because of this legal threat [1] made by your sockpuppet User:Paardekraal (indef blocked by Yunshui), who was confirmed to be you at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kehlstein. Admin probably shouldn't consider an unblock appeal unless that edit is dealt with, via WP:NLT. To be clear, it isn't this account that is indefinitely blocked, it is you personally, and any new accounts you might think about making would be quickly found and blocked, again using the Checkuser process. 14:19, 15 May 2013 (UTC)