User talk:Kdunn2012

Welcome!

Hello, Kdunn2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dynamic Numeric Authentication, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 19:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I think you have an uphill struggle here. The key requirement is to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. A patent is better than nothing, but does not show notability, there are thousands of patents for things that never become significant. This appears to be a neologism that has no widespread currency, and your own research doesn't help unless it's been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Unless you can find good, third-party references, I can't see how this is going to survive. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dynamic Numeric Authentication

The article Dynamic Numeric Authentication has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced neologism. Only about a dozen ghits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dori ☾Talk ☯ Contribs☽ 19:01, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

I think you have an uphill struggle here, you need to provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. A patent, while better than nothing, does not show notability, just that something exists. At the moment this is jsust a neologism with no widespread currency. Your research doesn't help unless it's been published in a peer-reviewed journal. Unless you can find good third-party references, I can't see that this will fly Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:12, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]