User talk:Kdot92

Your message at Requests for feedback

	Hello Kdot92. Replies have been posted to your message at Requests for feedback. Please acknowledge the feedback and ask for additional assistance if you need it. If you do not respond to the feedback, your message and the replies thereto will be archived in a few days. Thank you!
	You can remove this notice at any time - click on this section's [edit] link and remove the section.

MonoALT (talk) 23:21, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karlton Watson

The article Karlton Watson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:FOOTY/n as he has only played for the academy side for Nottingham, and not the professional side.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ravendrop (talk) 22:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karlton Watson for deletion

The article Karlton Watson is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karlton Watson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ravendrop (talk) 01:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]