User talk:Kboro089
| This user is a student editor in Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Ottawa/CMN2160_Theories_of_the_Media_(Fall) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Kboro089, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 18:03, 8 October 2018 (UTC)
Notes
[edit]Hi, I have some notes on your article, Ancient Aesthetics.
- This article has issues with sourcing. Some of the sources you use include Wikipedia, which cannot be used to source itself. Another website, philosophybasics.com, would be seen as a self-published source at best since it's run by one person, who has stated that he has no official training in philosophy and that he heavily used Wikipedia as a source, so it wouldn't be seen as reliable. You also used the book Which Aesthetics" Do You Mean? Ten Definitions, which was published through an indie publisher with no true information about their editorial or verification process. This specific source wouldn't be seen as self-published per se, but unless we can show where it's routinely cited as a reliable source by authoritative reliable sources like scholarly or academic journals or texts, it wouldn't be seen as reliable. Keep in mind, not every published source is a reliable source - there's a lot of factors that go into what makes a source reliable.
- This looks like it has some original research in it, meaning that it contains connections, theories, or other research that you created based on sourcing that doesn't explicitly back up the claims. For example, what separates ancient aesthetics from regular aesthetics? Why are the ancient Greeks and Egyptians highlighted over say, Vikings, Europeans, or Native Americans in antiquity?
- The sourcing needs to very specifically state something for it to be in the article - we can only summarize what others have written. Something to keep in mind is that aesthetics essentially studies the object of beauty (its nature, creation, appreciation of), so what you want are sources that discuss the "why" of the beauty in ancient civilizations. Unless they discuss the "why", using a source that covers say, only the basic history of what a culture wore without going into the "why" from a philosophical viewpoint would be seen as original research since you're drawing conclusions that weren't in the actual source.
- There's a big concern here as to whether or not this is redundant to the existing article on aesthetics. The first two sections discuss aesthetics in general and what is defined as an ancient civilization, but not really a whole lot about the specific history of the study of the aesthetics of ancient civilizations (ie, how the study of this area began and grew, prominent people in the field) and so on. There are two sections about two specific cultures, but none about others. This needs more to it to really show how it would warrant its own article along the lines of Aesthetics of music or Aesthetics of nature. Something that would be good to research would be something like say, how the perception of aesthetics in ancient cultures have changed over time - in other words, has there been scholarly discussion over what makes one culture's aesthetics better than another's as it pertains to ancient civilizations? It may be better to summarize this more and merge it into the main article.
I hope that this helps! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 20:37, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Ancient aesthetic thought
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ancient aesthetic thought. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Ancient Aesthetics. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Ancient Aesthetics. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. PRehse (talk) 14:15, 15 November 2018 (UTC)