User talk:Kayas0706
June 2024
[edit]
Hi Kayas0706! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. jlwoodwa (talk) 23:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi jlwoodwa,
- Thank you for pointing that out. I apologize for any confusion caused by marking the edit as minor. I understand now that minor edits should only refer to superficial changes that could never be disputed, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. I will be more careful in the future to ensure that any edit changing the meaning of an article is not marked as minor.
- Thanks again for your guidance and understanding.
- Best regards,
- Kayas0706 Kayas0706 (talk) 23:41, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 06:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)- Dear @ST47
- I was recently blocked indefinitely for allegedly abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User
- îmHeval, as per the evidence presented at Wikipedia
- investigations/KurdîmHeval. I want to clarify that I am not involved in any such activities and have always strived to contribute positively and transparently to Wikipedia.
- I understand the severity of the accusation and the importance of maintaining the integrity of Wikipedia. However, I believe this may be a misunderstanding or a case of mistaken identity. I would appreciate it if you could review the evidence once more and provide me with further details so that I can address this situation accurately.
- I am willing to cooperate fully with any investigation and provide any necessary information to clear up this matter. If there has been any inadvertent mistake on my part, I sincerely apologize and am committed to resolving this appropriately.
- I kindly request that my block be reviewed and reconsidered based on this clarification. If further discussion or evidence is needed from my side, I am more than willing to participate.
- Thank you for your attention to this matter.
- Best regards. Kayas0706 (talk) 17:59, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Dear @PhilKnight
- Thank you for your response and for conducting an independent confirmation of the checkuser findings. I understand the importance of technical evidence in these situations. However, I am genuinely concerned that there may be an error in the interpretation or matching of the data.
- Given that I am confident in my innocence and that my IP address should not match that of the KurdîmHeval account, I kindly request further clarification on the specifics of the technical evidence used. Additionally, I would appreciate the opportunity to present any further information that could help clarify this situation.
- I am fully committed to resolving this matter in accordance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and I would greatly value any additional insights or steps that can be taken to ensure a fair resolution.
- Thank you for your attention and consideration.
- Best regards Kayas0706 (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
- Dear@ST47
- I was recently blocked indefinitely under the accusation of being a sockpuppet of the account KurdîmHeval. However, I would like to clarify that this accusation is entirely unfounded. The IP address associated with my account does not match that of the KurdîmHeval account, which clearly indicates that this block is based on incorrect information.
- I believe this block unjustly hinders my efforts to contribute positively to Wikipedia. Moreover, considering that this action is based on misinformation, it could be seen as an act of vandalism, which goes against Wikipedia's principles.
- I kindly request that this situation be promptly reviewed and the block be lifted. If necessary, I am prepared to escalate this issue to a higher platform or seek broader community input to ensure that it is properly addressed.
- I look forward to your assistance in resolving this matter fairly.
- Thank you Kayas0706 (talk) 18:01, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Kayas0706 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Your reason here Kayas0706 (talk) 18:13, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I have independently confirmed the checkuser findings. Your denial does not outweigh the technical evidence. PhilKnight (talk) 18:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Block
[edit]Blocking someone based solely on assumptions is entirely against Wikipedia's fundamental principles. A block imposed without sufficient and concrete evidence can be considered an abuse of authority.My areas of interest are Kurdish history and Iranian history. Being accused and blocked due to another user's vandalism related to these topics is completely unjust. Sharing the same areas of interest does not justify holding me responsible for the same actions.I am confident in my innocence and believe that this block should be lifted immediately. A block based on an incorrect assumption contradicts Wikipedia's commitment to being a fair and impartial platform. Therefore, I request that the situation be reconsidered and that a fair resolution be reached.@Iranic @HistoryofIran@st48@st47@philkinght Kayas0706 (talk) 15:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
is declined. User is making very strange claims there, indicating they fundamentally misunderstand their rights and fundamentally misunderstand almost all aspects of Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 18:43, 22 August 2024 (UTC)