User talk:KayakNicholas

Welcome!

Hello KayakNicholas! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you you need any help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Getting started Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia • Getting "adopted" by an experienced user How to: edit a page • upload and use images • start an article Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

User community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! JamesBWatson (talk) 14:33, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Links to Kayak site

I saw your post to the Kayak talk page in which you offered a link to your own website. I have had a look at your site, and it seems to me much more suitable than many of the links which were already in the article, so I have added it. I may say that this is unusual: most often when someone wants a link to their own site it is usually either commercial spam or sheer vanity, but your site is both good and relevant to the article. I should also like to say that you did the right thing is asking on the article's talk page whether to include the link: if you had simply posted the link yourself you might have been thought to have a conflict of interest, as the author of the site. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)