User talk:Kay Körner~enwiki

Wiggy Problem

{{helpme}} User:Wiggy! deletes the Sportverenigung Dynamo from the section succes at the Dynamo Dresden article in every time. He is discriminating me. He must be blocked, now!!!!!!! Now!!--Kay Körner 21:23, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

for the appreciation--but please, would you play fair too, and not remove templates or re-create items deleted at XfD discussions. Just makes extra work for admins who could otherwise help save appropriate articles. (smile)DGG 20:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC) What is a XFD Discussion?--Kay Körner 20:36, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks and you're welcome, but my contribution to the article was very small and not really barnstar-worthy, but thank you anyway. matt br 23:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Ditto! Jameswilson 00:32, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP Munich

Welcome, Kay Körner~enwiki, to the WikiProject on Munich! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Munich-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject Germany|Munich=yes}}. A few features that you might find helpful:

The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
We are in the process of developing a number of standards for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project!

Helpme

I'm blocked for ever.--Kay Körner 13:57, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Reply to helpme tag. Yes, it appears that you are indefinitely blocked. You were blocked for "Copyright infringement: repeated uploads of unacceptable images, sockpuppeting, and hate speech too," and there's also a discussion thread here discussing your contributions. The helpme tag is not an unblock request tag, and I'm not sure quite what kind of help you thought you would get. -FisherQueen (Talk) 15:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You do not have a correct name and talk things about sock dolls. I have User:Lucken rerouted to Kay! You don't help me, and then you trouble me senselessly. The pictures and Logos are from my-same. With annoyances and senseless rubbishes, I cannot deal.

I would like to be unlocked, further I write articles with this barrier.--Kay Körner 06:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC) On the German Wikipedia I am immediately blocked, because of providing the same article in German.--Kay Körner 07:04, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Nike(c).png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nike(c).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:46, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hartmut Briesenick.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hartmut Briesenick.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:41, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Hartmut Briesenick.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hartmut Briesenick.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Thank you for your work on Karin Büttner-Janz‎ article! It seems that you have huge problems due to image copyright issues now. You risk to be blocked completely from all wiki sister projects! So, first my advice should be to stop all image uploads until you are unblocked! Second advice: always use only one account, don't create or edit under any new ones in the future! Third, you should read a lot of Wikipedia's help pages related to copyrights, editing, etc. to get acquainted with Wikipedia's rules and standards! I'll try to return you into Wikipedia, although I have very few rights for that, I'm even not an admin here. But in your turn you should implement three necessary points above. Cmapm (talk) 00:10, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Helga_Haase.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Helga_Haase.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? — pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 21:20, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of René Bielke

The article René Bielke has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin ^{talk|contribs} 01:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Kay Körner. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Kay Körner~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

01:05, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

14:52, 22 April 2015 (UTC)