User talk:Kaweraugirl1

May 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Māori people, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —VeryRarelyStable 22:46, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@VeryRarelyStable What do you mean my edits did not appear to be constructive, I'm Indigenous Māori myself and I have always dug deep into the depths of my own culture, and I make sure what I edit is correct information. OK Kaweraugirl1 (talk) 01:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To date your edits have largely consisted of putting photos at random places in Māori people without reference to context or relevance. Wikipedia is not a scrapbook.

You should know that "I belong to group X myself" will get you nowhere on Wikipedia. Anyone could say "I'm Māori" and be lying. There are a large number of people who, for reasons best known to themselves, devote their time and energy to introducing false information into Wikipedia. In order for your edits to be accepted you need to provide published sources so that other editors can check for themselves.

However, as it is apparent that you are the same person as Rotoruagirl, I strongly suspect that my advice will fall on deaf ears.

—VeryRarelyStable 08:47, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Māori people. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —VeryRarelyStable 21:20, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rotoruagirl. Thank you. —VeryRarelyStable 09:38, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Rotoruagirl per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rotoruagirl. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:00, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]