User talk:Kaurigem

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Kaurigem! I am CordeliaNaismith and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

CordeliaNaismith (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gender article

Hello, Kaurigem. Would you mind discussing, on the talk page, the changes you want to make to the Gender article's lead (intro)? I disagreed with two of those changes you made, and reverted. For one, I see no reason to change "extending from one's biological sex to "extending from ideas of biological sex." Biological sex is hardly ever considered an idea. What are these ideas you seem to be referring to? The complexity of intersexuality? If so, we could note something about intersexuality in the lead. But with biological sex, we mean exactly what the article Sex states on that.

I also do not understand your changing "hard sciences" to "physical sciences." There are aspects of the social sciences that are physical as well, such as anthropology. Flyer22 (talk) 05:24, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On a side note, Kaurigem, it would help editors out a lot if you used edit summaries. Flyer22 (talk) 05:30, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I replied on my talk page. As I stated there, perhaps I was taking the wording "physical science" too literally. That article does specify that physical science can also be biological, after all. But, anyway, I stated more on my talk page, and made a different change to the lead in an attempt to solve this. Flyer22 (talk) 00:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:JosieSmile.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JosieSmile.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 21:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]