User talk:Katieh5584/Archive2

Apology to all

I spend a lot of my time reverting vandalism, but if I make a mistake and revert something which isn't vandalism, I apologise.--Katieh5584 10:25, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Another barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		The first time my userpage has ever been vandalised, and you had the... ahem... honour of reverting it. Nice catch, thank you :) Bettia (bring on the trumpets!) 08:31, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will second this emotion. For your work catching a vandal at my user page. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Katieh5584 (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for keep my userpage clean! P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 18:35, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Katieh5584 (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page!

I appreciate it! Regards, • CinchBug • 15:05, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.--Katieh5584 (talk) 17:58, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastic Job

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I've been trying to revert as much vandalism as I can, and today, you seem to be beating me every time. Fantastic job, keep up the good work. Hi878 (talk) 18:49, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I think you might want to go here. :) Hi878 (talk) 18:51, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Katieh5584 (talk) 14:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For excellent work on the recent changes patrol reverting vandalism. Immunize (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Katieh5584 (talk) 19:56, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Upsetting IPs

I was wondering what you had done to upset 193.63.48.253 (talk · contribs). I've granted that IP a month long wikibreak for this edit to your user page. Mjroots (talk) 17:13, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Katieh5584 (talk) 17:15, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great job

Keep it up and kickin' ass --Tommy2010 21:28, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks--Katieh5584 (talk) 21:29, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That was pretty dame fast. wiooiw ^(talk) 21:39, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Appreciate the reversions. :) Tommy2010 21:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC) Tommy2010 21:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem--Katieh5584 (talk) 17:56, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Am I too quick for ya? Girl speed it up! ;) Tommy2010 18:27, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, will do.--Katieh5584 (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

For reverting the vandalism on my userpage. I was looking at the contribution history and only noticed it now. Sincerely, --Pink Bull 03:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, problem.--Katieh5584 (talk) 08:51, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice Job

Compliments on being incredibly quick on the draw. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.110.121.179 (talk) 13:09, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chick_Evans_(baseball)

Hi. You appear to do great vandalism work, but you recently reverted an attempt by an article creator to delete the article under CSD G7 by blanking a page they were they contributed the only substantial information. Please be a little more careful. Very Respectfully.--v/r - T P 18:32, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry about that.--Katieh5584 (talk) 18:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And on the MicroVolts article, you reapplied a db-g7 tag after the author removed it. Please keep in mind that authors who request deletion can change their mind. Not a huge deal, but please just be aware.--v/r - T P 18:34, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks.--Katieh5584 (talk) 18:35, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for catching vandalism to my user page so fast. FrankFlanagan (talk) 21:20, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question about the deletion policy concerning Dr. Roushdy Gundy

Hi Katieh5584, I have a question concerning the abovementioned article. I placed a speedy-deletion template there, which was repeatedly removed by the creator (also by an IP, so nobody could be blocked). Then, suddenly, it was not reinstated as a speedy template, but as a prod-template, whíthout any reasons. Is this right? AdAstra reloaded (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake. I should have just rolled back the article.--Katieh5584 (talk) 15:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Dr. Ted Marcus

Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dr. Ted Marcus, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:51, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Katieh5584 (talk) 15:52, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: Catalyst-Benjamin Cummings-Laboratory Chemistry

Hello Katieh5584. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Catalyst-Benjamin Cummings-Laboratory Chemistry to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:57, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Katieh5584 (talk) 15:59, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User 70.245.189.105

You can strike out that warning message you sent to that user. It wasn't vandalism. Thank you. Philipmj24 (talk) 21:58, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I made a mistake.--Katieh5584 (talk) 22:00, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

... for cleaning up vandalism on my talk page. Cheers, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latavio

I noticed that you were reverting the removal of the PROD from Latavio. You did so by saying that the person was removing an AfD template. However, WP:PROD and WP:AfD are two different processes. By definition, any editor, even the creator of a page, may remove a PROD for any reason or even no reason at all. AfD discussion templates cannot be removed, but that was not the template found on that page. Qwyrxian (talk) 13:20, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake.--Katieh5584 (talk) 13:21, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

AIV

Nice double team work on the AIV report of that user ^_^ - Rich(MTCD)^T|C|E-Mail 14:00, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nathaniel Hitch

Oh dear! This is like a ball which keeps coming back.

A few days ago I accidentally pressed the wrong button. I am in the middle of writing an article on Nathaniel Hitch but that is a long way from being finished. I should have been using "sandbox" but was not and pressed the save button in error.

Gurt Posh the administrator was very helpful and removed the article. Great relief! However yesterday I advised Gurt that it was still popping up and this evening thought I would at least remove the text.

I did so but along came Katieh5584 on a white charger, undoubtedly intending to help and rescue the article.

Truth is that I do not want it resurrected. In a few months when I have finished the article to my satisfaction I shall load it again.

I hope that you now understand the situation and will allow the patient to pass away!

Many thanks

Weglinde (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem.--Katieh5584 (talk) 20:55, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for the revert. GcSwRhIc (talk) 22:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page has been semi-protected

Hi Katie. Because of the excessive attention from the 4chan creeps, or whoever they are, I have semi-protected your user page indefinitely. No reason why any new or unregistered user should legitimately edit it anyway. Thanks for fighting the good fight! Favonian (talk) 13:01, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the semi-protect.--Katieh5584 (talk) 13:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Boudreau

Hi Katie,

I am all for fighting the good fight and keeping spam off of Wikipedia, so can you please work with me to create a better page for John Boudreau. His page was one of my first and I am trying to follow best practices for Wikipedia.I am working on pages that will help to tell the story of Astonish Results, as I am a freelance business writer from RI working on this project. Astonish has been named the largest growing company in RI for 2 consecutive years and I want to tell their story. The culture they have created is very interesting and the story behind how the business started is also very interesting. I do not want my page to be deleted so, could you please help? Thank you! AstonishResultsWiki (talk) 14:02, 29 June 2011 (UTC)AstonishResultsWiki[reply]

Thank You for reverting the edit on "Shia Islam"

--Jawz shiachat (talk) 00:24, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great Western Railway

Just to let you know, your edit actually restored one IP's vandalism that had just been reverted by another IP. I expect you got into a muddle. Anyway, it's fixed now. -- Alarics (talk) 12:51, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Sorry about that.--Katieh5584 (talk) 17:00, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edmonds–Karp algorithm reverts

This is a WP:3rr warning for Edmonds–Karp algorithm. I also find it disturbing that you have labeled the other editor's efforts as vandalism. Glrx (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought it was vandalism as the sentence no longer made any sense. --Katieh5584 (talk) 20:40, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I read his edits as covering the case where there is not a unique path: consider a network with two paths of equal length and equal capacity. The that/which is an English grammar issue. Glrx (talk) 20:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, your'e right. I'll remove the vandalism warnings. --Katieh5584 (talk) 20:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have also reverted the article. --Katieh5584 (talk) 20:52, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Glrx (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My 'unconstructive' edit

I'm assuming you're an actual user and not a bot: if so, did you actually read my edit summary? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.13.64.219 (talk) 10:35, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I just did, that'd be quite unconstructive but all fixed now thank you... Badgernet ₪ 13:49, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ketamine

Wow, you are fast. This edit is not unconstructive but directly to the point, from the reference! It is an experiment on Xenopus oocytes, this are frog eggs, which are being used for such experiments. Can't you read the reference first before deleting? 70.137.133.47 (talk) 21:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I missed the reference. I'll remove the warning from your talk page. --Katieh5584 (talk) 21:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See link inserted above, it is a common model organism, because these frog egg cells are large and easily manipulated and probed. Read it. What was so strange about it, that it appeared as vandalism? Why does that happen to me so often? 70.137.133.47 (talk) 22:44, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have apologised, what more do you want?--Katieh5584 (talk) 17:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:81.104.175.117

Just to let you know, I removed your "warning 1" and replaced it with a second block (I assume Huggle did it's "back to No.1" when a few days has gone past). This guy is a pain (and a static IP), and keeps added odd data to many F1 articles. Hopefully this block might do the trick - but I'm not hopeful... Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:06, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK.--Katieh5584 (talk) 19:38, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HI KATIE

I am so sorry for my edit on toilet paper my edits on dr. seuss was a bit stupid of me but I was serious and that clockwork orange edit was true

hello Katie, I'm impressed

I had only made a small edit to demonstrate to a friend how easy it was to add to Wikipedia. You caught it in minutes, before I could walk home and return the text to my original. I'm impressed.Mlane 14:43, 7 July 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mlane78212 (talk • contribs)

3RR on Noelia ‎

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Noelia. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:45, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yehya Saade

Hi, I'm not really sure if your revert here is correct. the references are blogs, ok and thus unreliable, but the references (use google translate/babelfish) are talking about him. mabdul 13:12, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but I saw that his edits were already being reverted as vandalism. --Katieh5584 (talk) 20:40, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

consolecadet

I must edited in the wrong place when trying to start my user page. Sorry about that! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Consolecadet (talk • contribs) 21:19, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, no problem.--Katieh5584 (talk) 20:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Just to let you know, when you see edits like this one again, that is actually a sockpuppet of User:Brianwazere. His usual MO is that he will add completely stupid stuff to anything associated with EastEnders and launching personal/homophobic attacks on User:Raintheone, User:GSorby and User:MayhemMario. Just a heads up for future in case you come across him again!--5 albert square (talk) 18:07, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks.--Katieh5584 (talk) 20:18, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! :) - JuneGloom Talk 21:53, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Good Job! You just undo a good favor to my user page. Appreciate it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shobhit.Sharma.Wiki (talk • contribs) 21:05, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

86.46.223.184

Keeps removing block from talk page. Needs access revoked. Calabe1992 (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrights

Kindly advise why i was given a warning for removing copyrighted content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.156.13.11 (talk) 22:51, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't provide an edit summary, stating that.--Katieh5584 (talk) 08:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For you

		CVU Anti-Vandalism Award
		For beating me to almost every instance of vandalism that shows up on my Huggle feed! Keep up the great work! RA0808 ^talk _contribs 17:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Katieh5584 (talk) 17:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Katieh5584. I am from mongolia. The part that you want to keep is very speculative in nature. Mongolian people used to live in small yurts in big families thus it was common for males to sleep together. I am not homophobic, but this entry is doesn't meet the encyclopedic standards.

You should have stated that in the edit summary.--Katieh5584 (talk) 18:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For Article: - Lord Ghantakarna Mahavir

Please do not delete this article as its still incomplete. Give me some time I will complete it.

Thanking You, (Maitrikvora21 (talk) 19:34, 11 July 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Dawn French

I recently made amendments to Dawn French's wikipage and you found my changes to be vandalous. This is absurd.

Dawn French's face has been a Terrys chocolate orange since 1997 and made the "Its not terrys, its mine" catch phrase famous. However in 2007, she was dropped from promoting the product. Terry's marketing manager Stephanie Lea saying: "We are grateful to Dawn for the major impact she has had on our advertising and for the value that she has added over the last 10 years." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.221.53.36 (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She has been in the ads, but her face has never been a Terry's chocolate orange.--Katieh5584 (talk) 20:42, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She also never went for the part of Hermione Granger.--Katieh5584 (talk) 20:44, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Norton Hill School

Wow, you are having fun tonight. I have requested semi-protection for the page (WP:RPP) which means that only registered users will be able to edit. That will fix things and this lot will get bored and move onto whatever else they do for kicks. Good work fighting them off though! --Simple Bob^{a.k.a. The Spaminator} (Talk) 21:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.--Katieh5584 (talk) 21:29, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]