User talk:Katiefitz18
| This user is a student editor in Northeastern_University/Advanced_Writing_in_the_Health_Professions_(Fall_2018) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Katiefitz18, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:46, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
What does the article (or section) do well? Good structuring on history doing in chronological orders, applications on various symptoms well explained and various methods well explained. Although it was difficult topic for normal people, I could have understood what a psychotic therapy is.
What changes would you suggest overall? Upon reading, there were some parts that I felt like I was reading abstract of research article. Ex) post-traumatic stress disorder under applications and some other parts as well. Also, it seemed to me that putting application after method is good but yours also is good too. Lastly, putting a image on to your article may help your audience to understand.
What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? Maybe summarize and provide information to show that the audience is not reading abstract of research article. Addition of picture.
Did you glean anything from your classmate's work that could be applicable to your own? If so, let him/her know! Structure and categorizing contents were good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seog Jae Kang (talk • contribs) 16:10, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
Using the best sources for medical content
[edit]Hi, I wanted to make sure you were aware of requirements for sourcing medical content on Wikipedia. Biomedical content must be sourced according to specific Wikipedia rules. You can only use secondary sources. Primary sources like the one you used here are not acceptable for Wikipedia. Please carefully review our training for editing health or psychology topics. I will go through Psychedelic therapy and remove content sourced to primary sources. Elysia (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:23, 11 March 2020 (UTC)