User talk:KatieIda

Welcome!

Hello, KatieIda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Donna Harris (businesswoman) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

1776-s-harris-A7zwdn50TpiZ_6eYgSLoQA.html] "DC is a Natural Hub for Startups: 1776's Harris"] Bloomberg News, Retrieved on 8 November 2013</ref>, and The [[Chicago Tribune]].<ref>[http://www.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:12, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1776 (company) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

allverticals#6-washington-arlington-alexandria-dcva-15 "The 20 Hottest Startup Hubs in America"] Business Insider, Retrieved on 7 September 2013</ref> The region ranks 5th on [[

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Evan Burfield may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

//www.c-span.org/video/?310387-1/washington-startup-economy "Washington and the Startup Economy"] C-SPAN, Retrieved on 9 January 2013</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:19, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Evan Burfield Headshot.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Evan Burfield Headshot.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Super Mario Man 23:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from 1776 (company) with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1776 (company)

You left a comment on my talk page about an edit I recently made on the 1776 (company) page about explaining my deletion. I am currently in the process of writing the explanation (I've been having this particular section repeatedly inserted against consensus) and want to make it a thorough explanation. Thanks for reviewing KAIdc (talk) 19:13, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems entirely fine to me. It is always convenient to add an edit summary to explain an edit though, since it usually prevents any misunderstanding over content removal. Vandalism patrol pretty much consists of looking at diffs for changes that are harmful. The change you made looks like this - a large section of sourced content is removed without a comment explaining why this is done. Sections containing criticism are somewhat prone to removal by random editors so without any explanation those tend to be reverted. (The "See talk page" you left afterwards is perfect to counter that by the way) Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 19:27, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smart cities

I am editing the smart cities article heavily at the moment and am inviting you, as someone who has contributed significantly in the past, to it to engage. Please engage on the article talk page if you are interested rather than here. Thanks. PeterEastern (talk) 08:28, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Donna Harris (businesswoman) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donna Harris (businesswoman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donna Harris (businesswoman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:00, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Evan Burfield for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Evan Burfield is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Burfield until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sionk (talk) 22:50, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]