Jump to content

User talk:Kjjeffery

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Katejeffery)

I do not find this particularly amusing. I know what you have put is true. Annoyingly where i get on and off lies within the boundaries of zone D so it affects me and hundreds of thousands of people BIG TIME. It not only affects commuters but also leisure goers as well and also has a lot of other bad knock-on effects. Simply south 17:30, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katejeffery/sandbox (March 3)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Kjjeffery, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

[edit]
Hello, Kjjeffery. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Mz7 (talk) 22:11, 3 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Katejeffery/sandbox (March 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Your submission at AfC Barbara Farnsworth Heslop was accepted

[edit]
Barbara Farnsworth Heslop, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KTC (talk) 16:25, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Barbara Farnsworth Heslop.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Barbara Farnsworth Heslop.jpg, which you've attributed to Hilary Heslop. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 01:59, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Just wanted to let you know that I did some cleanup work on Barbara Farnsworth Heslop. The citations you had were fine for human reading, but using the {{cite journal}} templates allows us to know how many articles have citations to "Transplant", for example. I also added urls for the papers and a few wikilinks for the awards. None of this is stuff you were expected to know coming out of the gate, so no worries.

Thanks for your contribution!

Lesser Cartographies (talk) 02:07, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lesser Cartographies, thank you for improving the page! I'm just a newbie (obviously) and really appreciate the time editors like you seem prepared to take to help get things right. I will try and emulate what you did in future pages. Kjjeffery (talk) 08:28, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Barbara Farnsworth Heslop.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Barbara Farnsworth Heslop.jpg, which you've attributed to A VRT notice was applied over 60 day(s) ago, but no message at VRTS has been found since this tag was applied.. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]