User talk:Katebhom

No such vindication has occurred. Please do not engage in original research on wikipedia. Particularly in trying to cover up fraud that has apparently led to preventable deaths. If you have any further questions please use the article talk page. Thanks, IRWolfie- (talk) 20:54, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Katebhom/sandbox

User:Katebhom/sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Katebhom/sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Katebhom/sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:07, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Amaury. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Homeoprophylaxis, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Amaury (talk) 06:28, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Your recent edits to Wikipedia talk:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 00:33, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 00:51, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Katebhom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25880 was submitted on Jul 12, 2019 01:28:50. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 01:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]