User talk:Kask

JPI Birthday

Good catch with the birthday on the Pope John Paul I article. Thanks!

In the way of a more general welcome (because nobody seems to have welcomed you yet), here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

—mako (talk•contribs) 15:02, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for helpful notes.Kask 15:54, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! I look forward to seeing you around. —mako (talk•contribs) 21:27, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vabandust, et sind sellisel kombel tülitan, aga paremat kontaktivõimalust mul hetkel paraku pähe ei tulnud. Ma oleks nimelt väga tänulik, kui sa oskaks öelda, kus ja millist kirjandust võiks leida Gregorius XIII ja eriti tema kurikuulsa kalendrireformi kohta? Vastada võid mulle ükskõik, kas eesti või inglise kasutajalehe või ka meili peale: rotiloom@hotmail.com. Ette tänades: Athanasius Soter 16:45, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Suured tänud, arvan et saan nüüd essee kirjutamisega enam-vähem hakkama! Madis. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.4.119 (talk) 11:00, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vikiseminar

Tere!

Vikiseminarile ei ole eelregistreerumine kohustuslik. Ka arvuti kaasavõtmine ei ole kohustuslik. Me projitseerime ühest arvutist ekraanile. Sülearvuti olemasolu korral oleks võimalusi muidugi rohkem, sest siis saab ka ise infot otsida (tasuta WiFi on olemas). Kõik see puudutab seminari seda osa, kus me õpime toimetamist. Muus osas ei ole arvutit üldse tarvis. Andres (talk) 10:48, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Tomson

I personally think validation is a good criteria for addition in the "oldest" article of people over 112, but it doesn't concern me much. If you wish to have her added, put something in the talk-page of that article and it will be decided whether she stays or not. I noted when searching for her that she is indeed concidered oldest in Estonia, but she is also a known case so I assume validation has not been particularly successful. And I'm not Robert Young, but as it happens I don't speak Estonian (but Swedish, which is my first language).(Yubiquitoyama (talk) 13:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Aitäh teavitamast! Sakslastele on tõepoolest keeruline kaastööd teha, eriti kui keelt väga hästi ei oska. Isegi Norbert Angermanni artiklit tahtsid nad kustutada! Athanasius Soter (talk) 11:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A Problem about Pope Damasus I death

Dates have been set back to 384, amazing how so many books can have the incorrect information.--Captain-tucker (talk) 10:27, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re: Help

Well, I am not an Admin, so I lack the ability to block anyone. However, I have warned him and reverted those of his edits that have not been taken care of allready, and have requested administrator attention to his edits.

Any editor may warn a vandal. When you find vandalism, revert it, then place a message on his talk page warning him not to do it again. The best way is to use one of the templates here. The templates come in varying degrees of severity, so be sure to use the correct one. Read the instructions carefully.

If someone has repeatedly vandalized despite warnings and is obviously acting in bad faith, you can report him for administrator attention here. Read the instructions carefully! If the administrator thinks there is reason to, the offender will be blocked.

I hope that helps. Have a good day! Nutiketaiel (talk) 13:19, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An Admin? Me? Kask, I am many things; a wise man, a young man, a ta'veren, an infidel, a holy man, a pope, a divine pirate, a Legionnaire and a Kwisatz Haderach, among other things. There are even some who call me a god. But one thing I am not, is an Admin. They are far more powerful than one such as I. I am just a humble Wikipedian, struggling to do my part to fight the forces of Evil.

Let me know if there's anything else I can help with. If you're also interested in fighting the forces of Evil, check out the CVU, the front line against vandals. Nutiketaiel (talk) 14:52, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Kask! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Cristopher Tronco Sánchez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paavstidest kirjutamine

Tere, Kalev! Madis siinpool, oleks üks pakkumine keskaegsetest paavstidest kirjutamiseks. Kui oled huvitatud, siis saada mulle Viki kaudu kiri (minu kasutajale peaks olema meilide saatmine võimaldatud). Athanasius Soter (talk) 18:04, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Iseenesest on see pakkumine jätkuvalt üleval. Aga detaile oleks mõistlikum arutada natuke privaatsemalt kui Viki arutelulehel. Athanasius Soter (talk) 15:44, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kask. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hiiumaa Parish

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Kask, thanks for creating Hiiumaa Parish!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add your sources as soon as possible.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kask. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Kask. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mauro Gambetti moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Mauro Gambetti, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 17:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sirje Tamul for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sirje Tamul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sirje Tamul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

UtherSRG (talk) 18:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]