User talk:Kasikb
Hiya. I reverted your edit since I thought it was not written with a very neutral point of view. In addition, wikipedia edit history in itself is not a reliable source for the claim you are making. Try re-writing and re-submitting the content again once it meets a more Neutral point of view. --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
December 2015
[edit]![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --allthefoxes (Talk) 20:07, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Thank you i wish i could but DragonflySixtyseven just protected the account.
please read the information and links and allow some form of a criticism section to exist before you protect the account, the information is overwhelming and by not having the criticism section there in some form you literally could be putting peoples lives in danger if they end up going to this university, what with the deaths and death threats.
if i submit a update to you could you be able to modify the page and keep it protected, i can keep it very brief and just provide links to the articles?
thank you.
Requested critism section
[edit]hello
well here it is, if you cant put it in please let me know why so i can change it, some form of critism section must exist given all the things that have happened.
thank you.
______________________________________
Webster University Thailand has been the subject of ongoing public speculation and scrutiny over the practices of its administration and director in both the media and in lawsuits over the safety standards and maltreatment of students.
Webster University itself has acknowledged its failures in this campus through an internal review citing "dozens of significant trouble areas for the school, ranging from facilities overrun by pests to a toxic culture where students commonly believe their administrators are crooks."
____________________________________________________________________
- ^ "Webster University Thailand: Rampant Corruption, Fraud Put Blemish On Growing International Brand". CollegeTimes. 2015-03-04. Retrieved 2015-11-29.
- ^ https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/04/10/reports-troubles-webster-u%E2%80%99s-branch-campus-thailand
- ^ http://www.bangkokpost.com/lite/news/570847/webster-degrees-of-disappointment
- ^ http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/education/webster-u-acknowledges-failures-of-thailand-campus/article_5792b316-c560-5953-a6a4-7af5f1f0e36d.html