User talk:Karrotfan22

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:03, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Hanna-Barbera. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:04, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 20:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sony Pictures shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. King Shadeed (talk) January 16, 2021 at 16:22 (EST)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nickelodeon Networks

Hello Karrotfan22,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, Nickelodeon Networks, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Nickelodeon. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JW 1961 Talk 19:58, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

well ok then but thanks youKarrotfan22 (talk) 21:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicktoons (American TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Noggin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nickelodeon Networks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nickelodeon Networks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelodeon Networks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

kpgamingz (rant me • 🐦) 15:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Nickelodeon Networks. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. IceWelder [✉] 13:20, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at NickMusic, you may be blocked from editing. IceWelder [✉] 13:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC) Ok look im sorry i just wanted to do the history and its former parent company thats all i did not mean no disruptive editing User:IceWelder — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karrotfan22 (talk • contribs) 13:26, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reminded to stick to Wikipedia's policies multiple times above. Please remember to provide reliable sources for all content you add. IceWelder [✉] 13:58, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Nate • (chatter) 00:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon Networks

KPGamingz here again explaining that the "Nickelodeon Networks" page on Wikipedia can't be accepted. It isn't used in corporate uses nor does Nickelodeon reference it. The page has already been deleted 3 times now and you may get blocked from Wikipedia pretty soon due to repeated offenses. I understand you were trying to add some information but it doesn't work properly. kpgamingz (rant me • 🐦) 20:57, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

well should i ask one the admins if i can have the page restored. Karrotfan22 (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think any of the admins will restore the page. They also page protected from anyone creating it again. kpgamingz (rant me • 🐦) 21:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I know but i was quite sad that the page got deleted so maybe i can ask the admins so create a second infobox on ViacomCBS Domestic Media Networks called Nickelodeon NetworksKarrotfan22 (talk) 21:18, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they'll allow that sorry. kpgamingz (rant me • 🐦) 21:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay ThenKarrotfan22 (talk) 21:46, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]