Jump to content

User talk:Karantsingh

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Karantsingh! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Rankersbo (talk) 05:55, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Karantsingh, you are invited to the Teahouse

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Karantsingh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse
This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Missionary Sedhan

[edit]

The article Missionary Sedhan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently unremarkable publication of a missionary college, with no assertion of notability. Source only demonstrates its existence, not its notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Moswento talky 11:05, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gurmat Prakash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Akali Naina Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maharaja Ranjit Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sikhism in Norway may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • - ''Sikhismen: historie tradisjon og kultur'' <ref>(‘Sikhism: history, tradition and culture’) [Kristiansand, Høyskoleforlag 2007, ISBN 978-8276346763) in 2007</ref>, in [[Norwegian]] for schools. Another reference book, Sikhs in Europe<ref> [Surrey,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:35, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sikhism in Norway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norwegian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Attack on Sandeep Singh for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attack on Sandeep Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attack on Sandeep Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 09:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kapal Mochan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mahadev. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Vikram Singh (Shoethrower)
added links pointing to Punjabi and Chief Minister of Punjab
Kaum De Heere
added a link pointing to CBI

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited N Choe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rose Garden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Akali Kaur Singh Nihang

[edit]

The article Akali Kaur Singh Nihang has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability is not established. The only reference provided is a user generated encyclopedia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 09:33, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Masand

[edit]

The article Masand has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 06:13, 16 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baba Makhan Shah Labana, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Naik and Gujrat. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vikram Singh (Shoethrower) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vikram Singh (Shoethrower) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vikram Singh (Shoethrower) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wgolf (talk) 17:15, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Labanas, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kabadi and Tanda. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nadu Shah Labana

[edit]

Hi, you created this page. But you have not provided sufficient notability by using multiple WP:RSs'. Also there is no proof that his last name was Labana. Kindly add the sources, otherwise article will be deleted. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jamalpur Fake Encounter for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jamalpur Fake Encounter is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamalpur Fake Encounter until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 05:25, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jathedar Baba Chet Singh Nihang Singh

[edit]

The article Jathedar Baba Chet Singh Nihang Singh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

not enough sources provided to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 01:38, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Guru Ki Maseet

[edit]

The article Guru Ki Maseet has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources provided

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 01:46, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning - Creation of unsourced articles

[edit]

Hello Karantsingh, Please stop creating unsourced or poorly sourced articles. Despite getting enough warnings in past you have continued to create poorly sourced articles. Please consider this a warning. If you continue this behavior, I will report you to administrators and you may be blocked from editing. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 01:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

    • Vigyani, I had contributed in many articles, with many appropriate sources and done several required updates on various articles, with appropriate references. I use sources like Newspaper, Magazines, Government Websites and Books. While starting a new article, I use to put -> Under Construction <- template on same. Remember, I am not regular or daily visitor of wiki, so some articles status remained on hold, but it does not mean that it will remain on hold. So instead of telling me the way to resolve it out, you have started showing me the administrator shoe, of which i am not scared. Please go and tell them. If they want to delete my account, please request them to remove each and every work i have done on wiki starting from 13:34, 26 February 2014. Or. Tell me what way you want me to create an article. Thanks (Karantsingh (talk) 10:03, 11 December 2014 (UTC))[reply]
  • I have brought your reply here so that entire discussion can be kept in one place. You can also reply here itself instead of posting on my talk page. I appreciate your creation of many articles and providing sources. The problem is with many other articles which either don't have sources or are poorly sourced. To begin, the under construction tag is generally not to be used on new articles with small content. However, problem is not that you want to develop articles at slow pace. Problem is sourcing. Infact some of the articles such as Padarath, Guru Ki Maseet are/were completely unsourced. The solution for you is that you can write only that much for which you are going to add sources. Next time, when you bring more sources, you can add more text. If you have less time, you can create one article at a time. But still if you want to continue the way you are doing right now, you can create articles in your userspace (for ex. User:Karantsingh/ARTICLENAME) and bring them to mainspace, whenever the article is ready. Unsourced text in mainspace is detrimental for WP quality. Now coming to admin shoe, some of your articles have been deleted, some articles PRODed earlier. These many notifications were enough message to indicate that you need to do more to show the notability of the subjects. For Nadu Shah Labana, I wrote to you specifically to provide sources without PRODing it, but you didn't get the hint. Moreover, it was no shoe. Blocks are not punitive, but to prevent disruption. Many users contributing much more than you or me are often blocked, when the fail to follow WP policies. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 12:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I do not care of other VOLUNTEERS who are contributing more are deleted. It is about me. If i am doing something wrong, it is acceptable, and will try to correct. I have provided Government Websites, Historical Gurdwara Sources and Books for Nadu Shah Labana. He was one of noted among Early Sikhs. Now you will say there are Early Thousand. Sorry we do not have name of all Early Thousands in history but few shining stars are named in history, their memorials are made preserved and even government not hesitate to take their name in their websites which i have sourced and Sikh preachers also use his name while preachings. If you will say Nadu Shah Labana is not notable, on what grounds? Then many other recognize Early Sikhs article can be removed. I will add more Bookish Sources for you. If article is Unsourced, then add template to add sources and message me, instead proposing it for deletion. By mistake i opened wiki and saw this, else you could have remove all work in a second. Jathedar Baba Chet Singh is again a Notable personality in realm of Sikhs. Previously you also question Jamalpur Encounter Case which was hot topic during that period, and your admins kept it. Remember I am not volunteer, not your employee. Some things take time to learn. How i interpret Wiki Definitions can be differ how other. So this mismatch lead to creation of such non notable articles. As you are front face, so it is your duty to understand how i understand notability and what actually wiki wants. I will give you as many sources you want. But as of now i understand and i will create article on my userspace. For Padarath, i will add sources shortly as Now i need to go away from system and may return on Monday. Lets see if wiki can keep padarath, The important aspect of Guru Granth Sahib :p (Karantsingh (talk) 12:57, 11 December 2014 (UTC))[reply]
1. To know about if any of the article you are interested in is changed, use watchlist and by configuring your email ID, you can get email whenever article is edited. 2. Nadu Shah Labana was just an example. See, when something is not-notable, we don't have to prove it. But if it is notable, we have to prove it. WP:BURDEN. 3. We all are volunteers. 4. Many Sikhs maybe notable, but until we provide sources to verify, we can not write article. This is general problem with large number of Indian topics (in general with all developing countries). But we can't help it. Infact you maybe surprised to know that in some cases, something which we think is wrong maybe right on WP, if majority of the world believe otherwise. See Wikipedia:Verifiability, not truth. And I am no front face, I just try to help new users and do my bit. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 14:02, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pandit Rao Dharennavar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zafarnama. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jhatka Parkash

[edit]

The article Jhatka Parkash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NBOOKS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 09:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baba Darbara Singh

[edit]

The article Baba Darbara Singh has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 10:37, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Darbara Singh

[edit]
  • Article Darbara Singh was tagged because it had zero sources to verify anything in the article. You have added some sources, but I am not convinced that the subject still passes notability guidelines which require "multiple reliable sources independent of the subject". Mahan Kosh has only a passing mention and the Budda Dal website is not independent of the subject. Self-published or the sources related to the subject are not considered reliable. So I urge you to add any other sources you know to show that the subject is notable. Any newspaper article on him, any discussion about him in some book etc.
    • Darbara Singh was a Jathedar of Khalsa Panth. I think there should be no doubt on his notability. If you doubt, it will be like Every Jathedar of Khalsa Panth is not notable and only Akali Phula Singh is notable. Again, Like Jains have 24 Tiranthkara and Sumatinatha is one of them, which is as Notable as Mahavira, But if you check his article, it is so short with one reference only same with others like Abhinandananatha. So I am trying to understand this point that: why a person who served as Jathedar of Khalsa Panth is not notable? or is Khalsa Panth not notable? Buddha Dal is oldest, well known Nihang Organization and its official website is one of good resource for information on the same. Mahankosh is itself a good reference and external source (not official like Budha Dal). As i have not added life history of this person which i know and it remain informational only. Rest i will reply you and add references for both in evening or tomorrow.
      • I am not in doubt about the actual real world notability of Darbara Singh. He was Jathedar of Buddha Dal and so an important leader. But for WP, we need sources to show that. Normally I try to find the sources before nominating any article for deletion. But if there is not much online information available, then I nominate for deletion. Sumatinatha and Abhinandananatha also appears to be unnotable going by the present sources. However, we can't knowingly add problems to one article just because the problems exist elsewhere, you can see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. If you think that they don't pass WP:GNG, you can nominate them for deletion. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:46, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jhatka Prakash

[edit]
  • Jhatka Prakash, according to me it fails all the requirements mentioned at WP:NBOOKS. I can't repeat all of them here and just put "no" in front of each. Since you believe that it passes WP:NBOOKS, I will ask you to point out which criteria it passes. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 06:41, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • #Added two independent Book sources referring Jhatka Prakash for its contribution and content type. #It was published by SGPC (Primary Institution of Sikhs for Management of Sikh Gurdwaras) and also author was Member of SGPC. #It was published in response to known author whose article is also on Wikipedia name Ranjit Singh, so have historical significant in literary war. If you think more is required to make it notable please mention what kind of sources will be good? some newspaper sources? or more books references? (Karantsingh (talk) 09:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC))[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baba Darbara Singh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Anandpur. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Idolatry in Sikhism

[edit]

Hi Karantsingh, I have moved that material to User:Karantsingh/resources, you can do whatever you want to do with it here in your userspace. Talk pages are meant to discuss the improvements in article. It is not meant to store any sources. I will like to point your attention toward another Wikimedia project called Wikisource https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page . Wikisource is created exactly for this kind of purpose. There you can store any number of books in partial or in whole. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 09:41, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

see these examples of Guru Granth Sahib and ਕਿੱਸਾ_ਪੂਰਨ_ਭਗਤ stored at Wikisource. Just be careful that whatever you upload there, is copyright-free. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 03:47, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dasam Granth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Benti Chaupai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bajwara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maharaja Ranjit Singh. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Verifiable

[edit]

Hi Fellow editor, it appears you are very familiar with the Guru Granth Sahib, but using that as a reference to back up WP:OR is against the rules on Wikipedia. What I suggest is reading up on WP:Verifiable . Thanks DeludedFan (talk) 09:52, 2 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Boothgarh) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Boothgarh, Karantsingh!

Wikipedia editor Lakun.patra just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please check the co-ordinates of the village in the map. It is well outside the state of Punjab.

To reply, leave a comment on Lakun.patra's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Orbit Aviation

[edit]

Hello Karantsingh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Orbit Aviation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 13:34, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Orbit Aviation

[edit]

Hello Karantsingh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Orbit Aviation for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:03, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orbit Aviation

[edit]

Please, do not removed Speedy Deletion tag. If you have concerns, please contest it on the talk page of an article Arthistorian1977 (talk) 15:07, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! 220 of Borg 10:19, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Guru Granth Sahib desecration, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faridkot. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015 Guru Granth Sahib desecration
added links pointing to MLA, Tarn Taran and Punjab Police
Mohali
added a link pointing to Athletics

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Das Granthi

[edit]

Hi, I'm Liechtenstein96. Karantsingh, thanks for creating Das Granthi!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please consider rewriting the lead so that everyone can understand the topic. It may be helpful to set links to other wiki sites which provide more detailed background. Kind regards, Liechtenstein96 (talk) 15:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Liechtenstein96 (talk) 15:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Keshdhari Hindus

[edit]

The article Keshdhari Hindus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough reliable sources that discuss the topic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Keshdhari Hindus for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Keshdhari Hindus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Keshdhari Hindus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kautilya3 (talk) 01:15, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Karantsingh. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gotras of Labana

[edit]

Template:Gotras of Labana has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:06, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Orbit Aviation

[edit]

Hello, Karantsingh. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Orbit Aviation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 03:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Karantsingh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Baba Makhan Shah Lobana Foundation

[edit]
Notice

The article Baba Makhan Shah Lobana Foundation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 10:44, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nang (Sikhism) for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nang (Sikhism) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nang (Sikhism) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Notice

The article Historical sites related to Dasam Granth has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources for anything. Some parts are complete gibberish.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Akali Sahib Singh Kaladhari

[edit]
Notice

The article Akali Sahib Singh Kaladhari has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, so not clear how notable this individual is. The article is so poorly written, it's a wonder it passed review.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:11, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Akali Sahib Singh Kaladhari for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Akali Sahib Singh Kaladhari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akali Sahib Singh Kaladhari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 15:24, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Karantsingh&oldid=1252261203"