User talk:Karachi Kings Dr

Please respond

Hi Karachi Kings Dr. I'm very concerned that your editing violates Wikipedia's policies for biographical information, neutrality, and promotion. It appears you may be working against a conflict of interest. Could you please respond? --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 16:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am reviewing Wikipedia policies, will comply all.

I have only updated paraphrased recent newspaper articles to the Wikipedia.

Karachi Kings Dr (talk) 16:33, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for responding. I'm copying your questions and concerns from my talk page below. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:28, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Briefly summarizing: What content belongs in a Wikipedia article is determined by the available references.

You may want to refer to WP:RSP and WP:RSN to see what discussion there has been on the use of a specific publisher.

Biographical information requires high-quality sources. Due to sanctions on such articles, editors need to be extremely familiar with all policies that apply. I recommend that inexperienced editors simply avoid such articles while they are learning Wikipedia.

WP:NOT identifies what content may be suitable for encyclopedia articles, repeatedly pointing out the need for independent sources. Just because something has been printed in the news does not mean it is suitable for an encyclopedia article.

WP:POV identifies what are suitable viewpoints to include in encyclopedia articles. POV is a very complicated policy. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 17:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Official Website

The official website of Khyber District website ‘khyber.kp.gov.pk' was launched by district administration. It became first merged district of the seven merged tribal districts to have official website.

Please advice me how this edit amounts to advert.

Karachi Kings Dr (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In general, having an official website is simply not noteworthy in an encyclopedia article. While the official website should be included per WP:EL, giving it any further treatment will certainly look like advertising.

The reference used was: https://www.dawn.com/news/1586983

It's attributed to "a correspondent", which puts its nature in question.

The format is that of a press release, slightly edited to be less promotional, with the addition of some relevant quotes.

You added it on the day of publication, which is WP:RECENTISM that looks very promotional in nature. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 18:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Faysal Bank

Females employees are required very strictly to wear headscarf with long gowns. According to bank Dress Code is introduced as cultural requirement.

This is the latest issue regarding the corporate sector in Pakistan.

Karachi Kings Dr (talk) 16:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://dailytimes.com.pk/679001/dress-code-for-female-bankers/

This reference is currently accessible. If you can, please indicate the author and the publication date. In the future, please include this information in with all references. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 21:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://propakistani.pk/2020/10/23/faysal-bank-mandates-hijab-and-loose-dresses-for-all-female-employees/

This doesn't include a specific publication date, a sign of low-quality publishing. The article is a quick summary of the bank's policy statement with no larger context. I don't see how this demonstrates any encyclopedic value. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 21:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

https://profit.pakistantoday.com.pk/2020/10/31/the-discriminatory-hiring-practices-of-islamic-banks-is-this-the-shape-of-things-to-come/

Not sure of the encyclopedic value. Karachi Kings Dr (talk) 18:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! That definitely gives context, This is exactly what Faysal Bank is doing to show how it is moving from conventional banking to Islamic banking, in effect following in the footsteps of the trail blazed by Meezan Bank, the leading Islamic bank in the country. However, it's already in the article. I'm not sure how much we should mention about the details of this transition, or the criticism they've received. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 20:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Esra Bilgiç

Esra Bilgic is vey famous in Pakistan due to recent airing of Ertugrul Ghazi on state television network.

Karachi Kings Dr (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First, please try to work in small edits with clear edit summaries to other editors can see what you're trying to accomplish and help.

You added multiple subsections with the edit summary "Brand Ambassador". That comes across as wanting to promote as much as possible without regard to the references or policy. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 22:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

ST47 (talk) 22:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Karachi Kings Dr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account has nothing to do with sockpuppets Dawood.XV Karachi Kings Dr (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning that there is technical evidence to support it. If you are not a sockpuppet, you will need to give a plausible explanation as to why the technical evidence indicates otherwise. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Construction industry of the Pakistan (December 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Construction industry of the Pakistan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Construction industry of the Pakistan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 00:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Karachi Kings Dr! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SL93 (talk) 00:34, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:La Prairie (cosmetics)

Hello, Karachi Kings Dr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:La Prairie (cosmetics), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:National Gas Transmission Company (Pakistan)

Hello, Karachi Kings Dr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:National Gas Transmission Company (Pakistan), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Construction industry of the Pakistan

Hello, Karachi Kings Dr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Construction industry of the Pakistan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Construction industry of the Pakistan

Hello, Karachi Kings Dr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Construction industry of the Pakistan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]