User talk:KapitanCookie

KapitanCookie, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi KapitanCookie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Phlebotomy

Please do keep the Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle in mind. Thanks. --Saddhiyama (talk) 00:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

After going through your edits it is quite clear that you are a WP:SPA doing nothing but adding spam links to articles and then attempting to cover up those edits with a nonsense follow-up edit claiming to remove a few "unnecessary spaces". This is the last warning, do not add spamlinks to articles again or you will be blocked from editing. --Saddhiyama (talk) 00:30, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bond No. 9

The article Bond No. 9 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No notability. 3 sources nothing but commercial spam, last one seems to be a reliable source, but no content that reveals any kind of notability for a standalone article. It should be noted that the creator of the article is a sneaky WP:SPA spammer, which have tried adding various spamlinks to articles and then covering those edits with followup nonsense "removing unnecessary spaces" edits.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Saddhiyama (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]