User talk:Kangaflora
Kangaflora, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Kangaflora! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC) |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ben Chapman (journalist) (September 3)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ben Chapman (journalist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Granada Reports "unfairly targeted"
[edit]Hello. ITV News Granada Reports is not being "unfairly targeted" as you said. If you go throughout the Wikipedia, they are all going through the same thing – non-notable people are being removed per WP:LISTPEOPLE. If they are not notable (no article, no notable significance), then they do not belong here on Wikipedia. That is why I keep removing them. Check out any of the U.S. National news like NBC News, CNN, etc., they have all been removed, and will continued to be removed. Corkythehornetfan (Talk) 02:10, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Ben Chapman (journalist) concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ben Chapman (journalist), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Draft:Ben Chapman (journalist) concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ben Chapman (journalist), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Recent edit to The X Factor (UK TV series)
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. While the content of your edit may be true, I have removed it because its depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives as an encyclopedia. I recognize that your edit was made in good faith and hope you will familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not so we may collaborate in the future. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Ben Chapman (journalist)
[edit]Hello, Kangaflora. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Ben Chapman".
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply {{db-afc}}
or {{db-g13}}
code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Ben Chapman (journalist)}}
, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. RichT|C|E-Mail 21:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
GMB (2014 edition)
[edit]Hello. Please do NOT add the days of the week next to presenters as you did in Good Morning Britain. This breaks WP:NOTTVGUIDE (or WP:NOTDIRECTORY). If you continue, and do edit war, you will be reported. Thanks, 🍀 Corkythehornetfan 🍀 18:22, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Kangaflora. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kangaflora. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Kangaflora. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]User pages and BLP
[edit]Just a note, WP:BLP applies everywhere on Wikipedia, including user pages. If there is something controversial or potentially defamatory, it must have a reference or some indication that it is verifiable, otherwise it needs to be removed. I never like messing around with a user's own page, but sometimes it is necessary. Primefac (talk) 14:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)